Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214239›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Protonation Enhances the Inherent Helix-Forming Propensity of pHLIP.

Chitrak Gupta, Blake Mertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Small animal PET imaging with theEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  2. Arginine Residues Modulate the Membrane Interactions of pHLIP Peptides.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Activity and characterization of a pH-sensitive antimicrobial peptide.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer targeting peptides.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Membrane-Induced p KJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chitrak GuptaC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, 217 Clark Hall, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Blake MertzC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, 217 Clark Hall, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.

Funding

Optimizing pHLIP: understanding biophysical interactions of membrane insertionR15GM120676 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI MERTZ, BLAKE · 2016 to 2016
$414k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM120676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) can be potentially used in targeted delivery of therapeutic cargoes. However, their conformation in solution is poorly understood. We employed molecular dynamics simulations to probe the structural fluctuations of an anionic CPP, pH Low Insertion Peptide (pHLIP), in solution to determine the effects of modifications to selected residues on the structure of pHLIP. Two types of modifications were tested: (1) protonation of aspartic acid residues and (2) point mutations known to affect the acid sensitivity of pHLIP. pHLIP samples conformations ranging from coil to helix to sheet, and modifications to pHLIP lead to subtle shifts in the balance between these conformations. In some instances, pHLIP is as likely to form a helical conformation as it is to form an unstructured coil. Understanding the behavior of pHLIP in solution is necessary for determining optimal conditions for administration of pHLIP and design of promising pHLIP variants.

Identifiers

PMID29214239
PMCPMC5709774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.