Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214146›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2017

MicroRNAs and toxicology: A love marriage.

Elisabeth Schraml, Matthias Hackl, Johannes Grillari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Breast Cancer Exposomics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiotoxicity of Chemical Substances: An Emerging Hazard Class.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Deciphering the role of microRNAs in mustard gas-induced toxicity.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Effect of Bortezomib on Global Gene Expression in PC12-Derived Nerve Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabeth SchramlTAmiRNA GmbH, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Wien, Austria.
Matthias HacklTAmiRNA GmbH, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Wien, Austria.
Johannes GrillariTAmiRNA GmbH, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Wien, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the dawn of personalized medicine, secreted microRNAs (miRNAs) have come into the very focus of biomarker development for various diseases. MiRNAs fulfil key requirements of diagnostic tools such as i) non or minimally invasive accessibility, ii) robust, standardized and non-expensive quantitative analysis, iii) rapid turnaround of the test result and iv) most importantly because they provide a comprehensive snapshot of the ongoing physiologic processes in cells and tissues that package and release miRNAs into cell-free space. These characteristics have also established circulating miRNAs as promising biomarker candidates for toxicological studies, where they are used as biomarkers of drug-, or chemical-induced tissue injury for safety assessment. The tissue-specificity and early release of circulating miRNAs upon tissue injury, when damage is still reversible, are main factors for their clinical utility in toxicology. Here we summarize in brief, current knowledge of this field.

Indexed as

BiomarkerDILImicroRNAsMinimal-invasiveToxicology

Identifiers

PMID29214146
PMCPMC5695539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.