Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214133›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2017

Systematic Review of Functional Analysis and Treatment of Elopement (2000-2015).

Megan A Boyle, Reesha M Adamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Longitudinal Examination of Wandering in Children and Adolescents With Autism.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elopement Patterns and Caregiver Strategies.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Assessing and Treating Elopement in a School Setting.Teaching exceptional children · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan A BoyleDepartment of Counseling, Leadership, and Special Education, Missouri State University, 901 S. National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897 USA.
Reesha M AdamsonDepartment of Counseling, Leadership, and Special Education, Missouri State University, 901 S. National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elopement is a dangerous behavior that is emitted by a large proportion of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Functional analysis and function-based treatments are critical in identifying maintaining reinforcers and decreasing elopement. The purpose of this review was to identify recent trends in the functional analysis and treatment of elopement, as well as determine the efficacy (standardized mean differences) of recent treatments. Over half of subjects' elopement was maintained by social positive reinforcement, while only 25% of subjects' elopement was maintained by social negative reinforcement. Elopement was rarely maintained by automatic reinforcement, and none of the studies in the current review evaluated treatments to address automatically maintained elopement. Functional communication training was the most common intervention regardless of function. Results are discussed in terms of clinical implications and directions for future research.

Indexed as

Effect sizesElopementFunctional analysisLiterature review

Identifiers

PMID29214133
PMCPMC5711741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.