Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29214038›Full record

ReviewLupus science & medicine2017

Cell-bound complement activation products in SLE.

Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Jian Li, Thierry Dervieux, Roberta Vezza Alexander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lupus science & medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Review of Complement Activation in SLE.Current rheumatology reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosalind Ramsey-GoldmanDepartment of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jian LiDepartment of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Thierry DervieuxExagen Diagnostics, Vista, California, USA.
Roberta Vezza AlexanderExagen Diagnostics, Vista, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of SLE is based on clinical manifestations and laboratory findings. Timely diagnosis and treatment are important to control disease activity and prevent organ damage. However, diagnosis is challenging because of the heterogeneity in clinical signs and symptoms, and also because the disease presents with alternating periods of flare and quiescence. As SLE is an autoimmune disease characterised by the formation of autoantibodies, diagnostic immunology laboratory tests for detecting and quantifying autoantibodies are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of SLE. These include ANA, anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and anti-Smith antibodies, together with other antibodies such as antiphospholipid or anti-Cq1. Complement proteins C3 and C4 are commonly measured in patients with SLE, but their serum levels do not necessarily reflect complement activation. Cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) are fragments formed upon complement activation that bind covalently to haematopoietic cells. This review focuses on the complement system and, in particular, on CB-CAPs as biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of SLE, vis-à-vis complement proteins and other biomarkers of complement activation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComplement activationFlow cytometrySystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID29214038
PMCPMC5704741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.