Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29213956›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia

The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging.

Camila de Assis Faria, Heloisa Veiga Dias Alves, Helenice Charchat-Fichman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04301960 (Comparison of the Effects of Single and Dual Task Training on Processing Speed, Cognitive Functions, Walking Speed, Dual Task Performance and Balance Functions in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04301960 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Effects of Single and Dual Task Training on Processing Speed, Cognitive Functions, Walking Speed, Dual Task Performance and Balance Functions in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Mediterranean UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled42ConditionsMild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsSingle task training, Dual task training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Incremental validity of the test of practical judgment (TOP-J) in the prediction of diagnosis in preclinical dementia.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camila de Assis FariaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Riode de Janeiro RJ, Brasil.
Heloisa Veiga Dias AlvesPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Riode de Janeiro RJ, Brasil.
Helenice Charchat-FichmanPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Riode de Janeiro RJ, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous neuropsychological tests for assessing executive functions in aging, which vary according to the different domains assessed.

objectiveTo present a systematic review of the most frequently used instruments for assessing executive functions in older adults with different educational levels in clinical and experimental research.

methodsWe searched for articles published in the last five years, using the PubMed database with the following terms: "neuropsychological tests", "executive functions", and "mild cognitive impairment". There was no language restriction.

results25 articles fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. The seven neuropsychological tests most frequently used to evaluate executive functions in aging were:[1] Trail Making Test (TMT) Form B;[2] Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) - F, A and S;[3] VFT Animals category;[4] Clock Drawing Test (CDT);[5] Digits Forward and Backward subtests (WAIS-R or WAIS-III);[6] Stroop Test; and[7] Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and its variants. The domains of executive functions most frequently assessed were: mental flexibility, verbal fluency, planning, working memory, and inhibitory control.

conclusionThe study identified the tests and domains of executive functions most frequently used in the last five years by research groups worldwide to evaluate older adults. These results can direct future research and help build evaluation protocols for assessing executive functions, taking into account the different educational levels and socio-demographic profiles of older adults in Brazil.

Indexed as

dementiaexecutive functionsmild cognitive impairmentneuropsychological testsolder adultsreview

Identifiers

PMID29213956
PMCPMC5619353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.