Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29213912›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia

Analysis of word number and content in discourse of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Juliana Onofre de Lira, Thaís Soares Cianciarullo Minett, Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci, Karin Zazo Ortiz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic literature review of automatic Alzheimer's disease detection from speech and language.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Word retrieval in picture descriptions produced by individuals with Alzheimer's disease.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2016
    Article
  16. A tutorial on discourse analysis in healthy and pathological ageing.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana Onofre de LiraPhD. Speech Therapist, Department of Speech Therapy, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thaís Soares Cianciarullo MinettM.D, PhD. Senior Researcher. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paulo Henrique Ferreira BertolucciM.D, PhD. Professor, Sector of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Karin Zazo OrtizSpeech Therapist, PhD. Professor, Department of Speech Therapy, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by impairments in memory and other cognitive functions such as language, which can be affected in all aspects including discourse. A picture description task is considered an effective way of obtaining a discourse sample whose key feature is the ability to retrieve appropriate lexical items. There is no consensus on findings showing that performance in content processing of spoken discourse deteriorates from the mildest phase of AD.

objectiveTo compare the quantity and quality of discourse among patients with mild to moderate AD and controls.

methodsA cross-sectional study was designed. Subjects aged 50 years and older of both sexes, with one year or more of education, were divided into three groups: control (CG), mild AD (ADG1) and moderate AD (ADG2). Participants were asked to describe the "cookie theft" picture. The total number of complete words spoken and information units (IU) were included in the analysis.

resultsThere was no significant difference among groups in terms of age, schooling and sex. For number of words spoken, the CG performed significantly better than both the ADG 1 and ADG2, but no difference between the two latter groups was found. CG produced almost twice as many information units as the ADG1 and more than double that of the ADG2. Moreover, ADG2 patients had worse performance on IUs compared to the ADG1.

conclusionDecreased performance in quantity and content of discourse was evident in patients with AD from the mildest phase, but only content (IU) continued to worsen with disease progression.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasedementialanguage

Identifiers

PMID29213912
PMCPMC5619403
OpenAlexW2132013601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.