Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29213309›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

Structure of a

Nathan Kruer-Zerhusen, Markus Alahuhta, Vladimir V Lunin, Michael E Himmel, Yannick J Bomble, David B Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Substrate selectivity in starch polysaccharide monooxygenases.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  19. Kinetic insights into the role of the reductant in HThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan Kruer-ZerhusenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY USA.
Markus AlahuhtaNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO USA.
Vladimir V LuninNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO USA.
Michael E HimmelNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO USA.
Yannick J BombleNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-8000
David B WilsonDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuxiliary activity (AA) enzymes are produced by numerous bacterial and fungal species to assist in the degradation of biomass. These enzymes are abundant but have yet to be fully characterized. Here, we report the X-ray structure of

resultsIn TfAA10A, Trp82 and Asn83 are needed for binding, but only Trp82 affects activity. The TfAA10B domain truncation mutants reveal that CBM2 is crucial for substrate binding, but that the X1 module does not affect binding or activity. The structure of TfAA10A is similar to other bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases with mixed features showing both type I and II copper coordination.

conclusionsThe role of LPMOs and the variability of abundance in genomes are not fully explored. LPMOs likely perform initial attacks into crystalline cellulose to allow larger processive cellulases to bind and attack, but the precise nature of their synergistic behavior remains to be definitively characterized.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBiomass degrading enzymesCelluloseLPMOOxidative chemistryThermobifida fusca

Identifiers

PMID29213309
PMCPMC5708082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.