Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29213113›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Intercalation events visualized in single microcrystals of graphite.

Edward R White, Jared J Lodico, B C Regan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward R WhiteDepartment of Physics & Astronomy and California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. ewhite@physics.ucla.edu.
Jared J LodicoDepartment of Physics & Astronomy and California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
B C ReganDepartment of Physics & Astronomy and California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. regan@physics.ucla.edu.

Funding

HIGH-END CRYOEM INSTRUMENT FOR UCLA ELECTRON IMAGING CTR FOR NANOMACHINES: AIDSS10RR023057 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ZHOU, Z HONG · 2006 to 2006
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrochemical intercalation of layered materials, particularly graphite, is fundamental to the operation of rechargeable energy-storage devices such as the lithium-ion battery and the carbon-enhanced lead-acid battery. Intercalation is thought to proceed in discrete stages, where each stage represents a specific structure and stoichiometry of the intercalant relative to the host. However, the three-dimensional structures of the stages between unintercalated and fully intercalated are not known, and the dynamics of the transitions between stages are not understood. Using optical and scanning transmission electron microscopy, we video the intercalation of single microcrystals of graphite in concentrated sulfuric acid. Here we find that intercalation charge transfer proceeds through highly variable current pulses that, although directly associated with structural changes, do not match the expectations of the classical theories. Evidently random nanoscopic defects dominate the dynamics of intercalation.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesElectrodesGraphiteIntercalating AgentsIonsLithiumMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionNanostructuresSulfuric AcidsSurface PropertiesGraphiteIntercalating AgentsIonsLithiumsulfuric acidSulfuric Acids

Identifiers

PMID29213113
PMCPMC5719043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.