Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29213099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) predicts therapy response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

M Trajkovic-Arsic, I Heid, K Steiger, A Gupta, A Fingerle, C Wörner, N Teichmann, S Sengkwawoh-Lueong, P Wenzel, A J Beer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M Trajkovic-ArsicDivision of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
I HeidInstitute of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
K SteigerInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-5433
A Gupta2. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
A FingerleInstitute of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
C WörnerInstitute of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
N Teichmann2. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S Sengkwawoh-LueongDivision of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
P Wenzel2. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
A J BeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
I EspositoInstitute of Pathology, University Clinic Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
R BrarenInstitute of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. rbraren@tum.de.
J T SivekeDivision of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. j.siveke@dkfz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular subtyping of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) support individualization of therapeutic strategies in this most aggressive disease. With the emergence of various novel therapeutic strategies and neoadjuvant approaches in this quickly deteriorating disease, robust approaches for fast evaluation of therapy response are urgently needed. To this aim, we designed a preclinical imaging-guided therapy trial where genetically engineered mice harboring endogenous aggressive PDAC were treated with the MEK targeting drug refametinib, which induces rapid and profound tumor regression in this model system. Multi-parametric non-invasive imaging was used for therapy response monitoring. A significant increase in the Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) was noted already 24 hours after treatment onset. Histopathological analyses showed increased apoptosis and matrix remodeling at this time point. Our findings suggest the ADC parameter as an early predictor of therapy response in PDAC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiphenylamineDisease Models, AnimalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMiceNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsSulfonamidesDiphenylamineMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesN-(3,4-difluoro-2-(2-fluoro-4-iodophenylamino)-6-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)cyclopropane-1-sulfonamideProtein Kinase InhibitorsSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID29213099
PMCPMC5719052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.