Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212924›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Robust mixture modeling reveals category-free selectivity in reward region neuronal ensembles.

Tommy C Blanchard, Steven T Piantadosi, Benjamin Y Hayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abstract Value Encoding in Neural Populations But Not Single Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tommy C BlanchardDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, and Center for the Origins of Cognition, University of Rochester , Rochester, New York.
Steven T PiantadosiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science, and Center for the Origins of Cognition, University of Rochester , Rochester, New York.
Benjamin Y HaydenDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Neural basis of reward-based choiceR01DA037229 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of neurons into clusters based on their response properties is an important tool for gaining insight into neural computations. However, it remains unclear to what extent neurons fall naturally into discrete functional categories. We developed a Bayesian method that models the tuning properties of neural populations as a mixture of multiple types of task-relevant response patterns. We applied this method to data from several cortical and striatal regions in economic choice tasks. In all cases, neurons fell into only two clusters: one multiple-selectivity cluster containing all cells driven by task variables of interest and another of no selectivity for those variables. The single cluster of task-sensitive cells argues against robust categorical tuning in these areas. The no-selectivity cluster was unanticipated and raises important questions about what distinguishes these neurons and what role they play. Moreover, the ability to formally identify these nonselective cells allows for more accurate measurement of ensemble effects by excluding or appropriately down-weighting them in analysis. Our findings provide a valuable tool for analysis of neural data, challenge simple categorization schemes previously proposed for these regions, and place useful constraints on neurocomputational models of economic choice and control. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present a Bayesian method for formally detecting whether a population of neurons can be naturally classified into clusters based on their response tuning properties. We then examine several data sets of reward system neurons for variables and find in all cases that neurons can be classified into only two categories: a functional class and a non-task-driven class. These results provide important constraints for neural models of the reward system.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalRewardAnimalsBayes TheoremBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorEye Movement MeasurementsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceRisk-Takingclusteringfunctional subtypesmixed selectivityprefrontal cortexreward

Identifiers

PMID29212924
PMCPMC5966738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.