ArticleBiology open2018
Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine: from Discovery and Molecular Mechanisms To Therapeutic Applications and Clinical Challenges".Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Application potential of induced pluripotent stem cells in the research and treatment of autoimmune diseases (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Urine-derived stem cells: a sustainable resource for advancing personalized medicine and dental regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Application prospects of urine-derived stem cells in neurological and musculoskeletal diseases.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Review
- Unlocking the therapeutic potential: odyssey of induced pluripotent stem cells in precision cell therapies.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024Review
- Beyond waste: understanding urine's potential in precision medicine.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Organoids in Advancing Neuropathology Research and Therapies.Cells · 2024Review
- Genome Engineering of Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells to Express Lactoferrin and Deoxyribonuclease.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023Article
- Article
- From Spheroids to Organoids: The Next Generation of Model Systems of Human Cardiac Regeneration in a Dish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Urine-derived induced pluripotent/neural stem cells for modeling neurological diseases.Cell & bioscience · 2021Review
- Urine-derived stem cells: applications in skin, bone and articular cartilage repair.Burns & trauma · 2021Review
- Formation and optimization of three-dimensional organoids generated from urine-derived stem cells for renal function in vitro.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Article
- Advances in Pluripotent Stem Cells: History, Mechanisms, Technologies, and Applications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generation of human cardiomyocytes from cells derived from various sources, including skin biopsy, has been made possible by breakthrough advances in stem cell research. However, it is attractive to build up a negligibly invasive way to create induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. In this study, we created iPS cells from human urine-derived epithelial cells by gene transduction using lentiviral vectors in a totally noninvasive manner. Then, we induced the differentiation of iPS cells into functional cardiomyocytes both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.