Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212726›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Rapid evolution rescues hosts from competition and disease but-despite a dilution effect-increases the density of infected hosts.

Alexander T Strauss, Jessica L Hite, Marta S Shocket, Carla E Cáceres, Meghan A Duffy, Spencer R Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander T StraussDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA straussa@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-8443
Jessica L HiteDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Marta S ShocketDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Carla E CáceresSchool of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Meghan A DuffyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Spencer R HallDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virulent parasites can depress the densities of their hosts. Taxa that reduce disease via dilution effects might alleviate this burden. However, 'diluter' taxa can also depress host densities through competition for shared resources. The combination of disease and interspecific competition could even drive hosts extinct. Then again, genetically variable host populations can evolve in response to both competitors and parasites. Can rapid evolution rescue host density from the harm caused by these ecological enemies? How might such evolution influence dilution effects or the size of epidemics? In a mesocosm experiment with planktonic hosts, we illustrate the joint harm of competition and disease: hosts with constrained evolutionary ability (limited phenotypic variation) suffered greatly from both. However, populations starting with broader phenotypic variation evolved stronger competitive ability during epidemics. In turn, enhanced competitive ability-driven especially by parasites-rescued host densities from the negative impacts of competition, disease, and especially their combination. Interspecific competitors reduced disease (supporting dilution effects) even when hosts rapidly evolved. However, this evolutionary response also elicited a potential problem. Populations that evolved enhanced competitive ability and maintained robust total densities also supported higher densities of infections. Thus, rapid evolution rescued host densities but also unleashed larger epidemics.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsDaphniaMetschnikowiaPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsDaphniadilution effectdisease ecologyeco-evolutionary dynamicsfriendly competitionrapid evolution

Identifiers

PMID29212726
PMCPMC5740282
OpenAlexW2771765668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.