Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212700›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018

The Alere BinaxNOW Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen Test: Diagnostic Sensitivity for Adult Pneumococcal Pneumonia and Relationship to Specific Serotypes.

Hisashi Shoji, Arnau Domenech, Antonella Francesca Simonetti, Aida González, Dolores García-Somoza, Meritxell Cubero, Sara Martí, Masayuki Maeda, Fe Tubau, Josefina Liñares and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Things We Do for No Reason - OrderingOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Modern diagnostics in emergency medicine.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Presentation and outcome of suspected sepsis in a high-HIV burden, high antiretroviral coverage setting.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hisashi ShojiMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnau DomenechMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonella Francesca SimonettiInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Aida GonzálezMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Dolores García-SomozaMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell CuberoMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara MartíMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Masayuki MaedaDivision of Infection Control Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Fe TubauMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Josefina LiñaresMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Angeles DomínguezMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi CarratalàInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen ArdanuyMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain c.ardanuy@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the sensitivity of the BinaxNOW pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUA) test for adult pneumococcal pneumonia caused by different serotypes. In this study, we aimed to analyze the trends in the sensitivity of the PUA test over a 15-year period (2001 to 2015) and to analyze its sensitivity for pneumococcal pneumonia caused by different serotypes. In total, we analyzed 1,096 pneumococcal isolates from adults with pneumococcal pneumonia who had a PUA test performed at the onset of the episode. Three periods were analyzed: 2001 to 2005 (early use of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [early PCV7]), 2006 to 2010 (late PCV7), and 2011 to 2015 (early PCV13). The sensitivity of the PUA test varied from 76.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.5% to 82.4%) in the period from 2001 to 2005 to 77.9% in 2006 to 2010 (95% CI, 74.4% to 81.4%) and decreased to 60.5% (95% CI, 55.4% to 65.6%) in 2011 to 2015. This decrease was observed in 560 proven (83.2% in 2001 to 2005, 86.5% in 2006 to 2010, and 78.1%) and 536 probable (70.0% in 2001 to 2005, 68.7% in 2006 to 2010, and 41.5% in 2011 to 2015) episodes of pneumococcal pneumonia. Differences were observed in the sensitivity of the PUA test for diagnosing pneumonia caused by certain serotypes, being highest for the 9V (90.6%), 14 (86.8%), 18C (100%), and 20 (100%) serotypes and lowest for the 8 (55.2%), 9L/N (39.1%), 11A (48.8%), 23B (33.3%), and nontypeable (47.8%) serotypes. Comparing 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2015, the prevalence of serotypes 9V (3.1%, 3.7%, and 1.7%, respectively) and 14 (7.2%, 5.1%, and 3.1%, respectively) decreased, while the prevalence of serotypes 23B (0%, 0.7%, and 1.4%, respectively), 9L/N (1.0%, 1.6%, and 3.4%, respectively), 11A (2.6%, 4.2%, and 3.7%, respectively), and 8 (1.5%, 1.5%, and 5.1%, respectively) increased. The PUA test sensitivity varied by pneumococcal pneumonia serotype, and these differences and the changes in serotype distribution were associated with an overall decrease in the sensitivity of the PUA test.

Indexed as

SerogroupAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, BacterialClinical Laboratory TechniquesHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate VaccineHospitals, TeachingHumansMiddle AgedPneumonia, PneumococcalPrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificitySpainStreptococcus pneumoniaeYoung AdultAntigens, BacterialHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccinecommunity-acquired pneumoniainvasive pneumococcal diseasepneumococcal conjugate vaccinepneumococcal urinary antigen testStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID29212700
PMCPMC5786729
OpenAlexW2771442133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.