Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212614›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology2018

Clinical trials in gynecologic oncology: Past, present, and future.

Christina M Annunziata, Elise C Kohn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M AnnunziataWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: annunzic@mail.nih.gov.
Elise C KohnWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Clinical trials in womens cancersZIABC011584 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ANNUNZIATA, CHRISTINA · 2014 to 2023
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gynecologic Oncology Group has historically performed ground-breaking, practice-changing clinical trials in women's cancers. The current standard of care for initial treatment of ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and trophoblastic cancers was determined by clinical trials completed within this cooperative group structure. For example, trial GOG-0111 set the standard for combining platinum and taxane chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, and more recently GOG-0240 provided evidence for adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for women with advanced cervical cancer. The landscape of clinical trial design has markedly changed in recent decades, with a clear emphasis on streamlining drug development towards specific patient populations and indications for investigational agents. Translational science in gynecologic cancers can set the stage for rapid and efficient introduction of new therapies for our patients. The gynecologic oncology community of researchers and clinicians is well positioned to enter into the new era of drug development, with breakthrough discoveries increasing each year. It is clear that we must incorporate smarter clinical trial design to get the right drugs to the right patients expeditiously, so we can continue to improve outcome for women with gynecologic cancers.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleForecastingGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersClinical trialsCooperative groupGynecologic cancersTrial design

Identifiers

PMID29212614
PMCPMC5801214
OpenAlexW2774459878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.