Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212538›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2017

A pilot investigation of audiovisual processing and multisensory integration in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

Mark H Myers, Alessandro Iannaccone, Gavin M Bidelman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark H MyersDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA. mmyers25@uthsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4692-233X
Alessandro IannacconeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Retinal Degenerations and Ophthalmic Genetic Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Gavin M BidelmanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we examined audiovisual (AV) processing in normal and visually impaired individuals who exhibit partial loss of vision due to inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs).

methodsTwo groups were analyzed for this pilot study: Group 1 was composed of IRD participants: two with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP), two with autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (CORD), and two with the related complex disorder, Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS); Group 2 was composed of 15 non-IRD participants (controls). Audiovisual looming and receding stimuli (conveying perceptual motion) were used to assess the cortical processing and integration of unimodal (A or V) and multimodal (AV) sensory cues. Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to simultaneously resolve the temporal and spatial characteristics of AV processing and assess differences in neural responses between groups. Measurement of AV integration was accomplished via quantification of the EEG's spectral power and event-related brain potentials (ERPs).

resultsResults show that IRD individuals exhibit reduced AV integration for concurrent audio and visual (AV) stimuli but increased brain activity during the unimodal A (but not V) presentation. This was corroborated in behavioral responses, where IRD patients showed slower and less accurate judgments of AV and V stimuli but more accurate responses in the A-alone condition.

conclusionsCollectively, our findings imply a neural compensation from auditory sensory brain areas due to visual deprivation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPilot ProjectsRegression AnalysisRetinal DystrophiesVisual PerceptionYoung AdultElectroencephalographyEvent-related brain potentialsInherited retinal dystrophiesPower spectral density analysis

Identifiers

PMID29212538
PMCPMC5719743
OpenAlexW2773000772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.