Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212528›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Effectiveness of robot-assisted training added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with humeral fracture early after surgical treatment: protocol of a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial.

Corinna Nerz, Lars Schwickert, Clemens Becker, Stefan Studier-Fischer, Janina Anna Müßig, Peter Augat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03100201 (Robotic-assisted Training After Upper Arm Fracture - a Multicentre, Controlled and Randomized Intervention Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03100201 nacompletednot on this map

Robotic-assisted Training After Upper Arm Fracture - a Multicentre, Controlled and Randomized Intervention Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRobert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF)Ran2016 to 2019Enrolled48ConditionsShoulder InjuryArmsIntervention Armeo®Spring, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Corinna NerzDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbachstrasse 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany. corinna.nerz@rbk.de.
Lars SchwickertDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbachstrasse 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Clemens BeckerDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbachstrasse 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan Studier-FischerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Janina Anna MüßigInstitute of Biomechanics, BG Trauma Centre Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Strasse 8, 82418, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.
Peter AugatInstitute of Biomechanics, BG Trauma Centre Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Strasse 8, 82418, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.
Robert Bosch Hospital · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of proximal humeral fractures increases with age. The functional recovery of the upper arm after such fractures is slow, and results are often disappointing. Treatment is associated with long immobilisation periods. Evidence-based exercise guidelines are missing. Loss of muscle mass as well as reduced range of motion and motor performance are common consequences. These losses could be partly counteracted by training interventions using robot-assisted arm support of the affected arm derived from neurorehabilitation. Thus, shorter immobilisation could be reached. Thus far, this approach has been tested in only a few small studies. The aim of the present study is to examine whether assistive robotic training augmenting conventional occupational and physical therapy can improve functional shoulder outcomes. METHODS/

designPatients aged between 35 and 66 years with proximal humeral fracture and surgical treatment will be recruited at three different clinics in Germany and randomised into an intervention group and a control group. Participants will be assessed before randomisation and followed after completing an intervention period of 3 weeks and additionally after 3, 6 and 12 months. The baseline assessment will include cognition (Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test); level of pain in the affected arm; ability to work; gait speed (10-m walk); disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure [DASH]); range of motion of the affected arm (goniometer measurement); visual acuity; and motor function of orthopaedic patients (Wolf Motor Function Test-Orthopaedic version [WMFT-O]). Clinical follow-up directly after the intervention will include assessment of disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) as well as range of motion and motor function (WMFT-O). The primary outcome parameter will be the DASH, and the secondary outcome parameter will be the WMFT-O. The long-term results will be assessed prospectively by postal follow-up. All patients will receive conventional occupational and physical therapy. The intervention group will receive additional robot-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for 3 weeks. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes a phase II, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre intervention study. The results will guide and possibly improve methods of rehabilitation after proximal humeral fracture.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT03100201 . Registered on 28 March 2017.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRoboticsAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaClinical ProtocolsDisability EvaluationFemaleFracture FixationGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPain MeasurementHumeral fractureRandomised controlled studyRobot-assisted rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29212528
PMCPMC5719790
OpenAlexW2771547558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.