Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212525›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2017

Establishing and characterizing patient-derived xenografts using pre-chemotherapy percutaneous biopsy and post-chemotherapy surgical samples from a prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer study.

Jia Yu, Bo Qin, Ann M Moyer, Jason P Sinnwell, Kevin J Thompson, John A Copland, Laura A Marlow, James L Miller, Ping Yin, Bowen Gao and 20 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Patient-Derived Xenografts of Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jia YuDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Bo QinDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ann M MoyerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jason P SinnwellDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kevin J ThompsonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John A CoplandDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Laura A MarlowDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
James L MillerDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Ping YinDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Bowen GaoDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Katherine Minter-DykhouseDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Xiaojia TangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sarah A McLaughlinDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Alvaro Moreno-AspitiaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Anthony SchweitzerAffymetrix, now part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA.
Yan LuAffymetrix, now part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA.
Jason HubbardAffymetrix, now part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA.
Donald W NorthfeltDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Richard J GrayDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Katie HuntDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Amy L ConnersDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Vera J SumanDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Krishna R KalariDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
James N IngleDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Zhenkun LouDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniel W VisscherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Richard WeinshilboumDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Judy C BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Wang.Liewei@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Drug Metabolizing EnzymesU19GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, LIEWEI, WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2010 to 2014
$15.8M
Investigate the role of TPD52-AMPK pathway in tumorigenesis and cancer therapyR01CA196648 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, LIEWEI · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
The Role of WSB1 in TumorigenesisR01CA189666 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOU, ZHENKUN · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Mayo Clinic Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence P50CA116201Mayo Clinic Cancer Center CA15083-40A2National Institutes of Health National Institutes of HealtNCI NIH HHS N01 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189666NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196648NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061388Pharmacogenomics Research Network U19 GM61388-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are increasingly used in cancer research as a tool to inform cancer biology and drug response. Most available breast cancer PDXs have been generated in the metastatic setting. However, in the setting of operable breast cancer, PDX models both sensitive and resistant to chemotherapy are needed for drug development and prospective data are lacking regarding the clinical and molecular characteristics associated with PDX take rate in this setting.

methodsThe Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY) is a prospective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) trial of stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant weekly taxane+/-trastuzumab followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Using percutaneous tumor biopsies (PTB), we established and characterized PDXs from both primary (untreated) and residual (treated) tumors. Tumor take rate was defined as percent of patients with the development of at least one stably transplantable (passed at least for four generations) xenograft that was pathologically confirmed as breast cancer.

resultsBaseline PTB samples from 113 women were implanted with an overall take rate of 27.4% (31/113). By clinical subtype, the take rate was 51.3% (20/39) in triple negative (TN) breast cancer, 26.5% (9/34) in HER2+, 5.0% (2/40) in luminal B and 0% (0/3) in luminal A. The take rate for those with pCR did not differ from those with residual disease in TN (p = 0.999) and HER2+ (p = 0.2401) tumors. The xenografts from 28 of these 31 patients were such that at least one of the xenografts generated had the same molecular subtype as the patient. Among the 35 patients with residual tumor after NAC adequate for implantation, the take rate was 17.1%. PDX response to paclitaxel mirrored the patients' clinical response in all eight PDX tested.

conclusionsThe generation of PDX models both sensitive and resistant to standard NAC is feasible and these models exhibit similar biological and drug response characteristics as the patients' primary tumors. Taken together, these models may be useful for biomarker discovery and future drug development.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalHeterograftsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceNeoadjuvant TherapyXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerPatient-derived Xenograft (PDX)Percutaneous tumor biopsies (PTB)Pre-clinical therapyProspective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

Identifiers

PMID29212525
PMCPMC5719923
OpenAlexW2774944351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.