Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212466›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2017

Exploring the use of tablet computer-based electronic data capture system to assess patient reported measures among patients with chronic kidney disease: a pilot study.

Dorothy Wong, Shen Cao, Heather Ford, Candice Richardson, Dmitri Belenko, Evan Tang, Luca Ugenti, Eleanor Warsmann, Amanda Sissons, Yalinie Kulandaivelu and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06396702 (Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06396702 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement (EASE) Intervention for the Management of Emotional and Physical Symptoms Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2024 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsTransplant, Failure,Kidney, Transplant, Failure, HeartArmsEASE-SOT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Health-related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients: association with graft function and comparison to patients on dialysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dorothy WongDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Shen CaoDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Heather FordDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Candice RichardsonDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Dmitri BelenkoDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Evan TangDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Luca UgentiDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Eleanor WarsmannDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Amanda SissonsDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Yalinie KulandaiveluDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Nathaniel EdwardsDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Marta NovakCentre for Mental Health, University Health Network and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Madeline LiDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Istvan MucsiDivision of Nephrology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. istvan.mucsi@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4781-4699

Funding

Department of Medicine and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network (Toronto, ON) Start-up Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollecting patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) via computer-based electronic data capture system may improve feasibility and facilitate implementation in clinical care. We report our initial experience about the acceptability of touch-screen tablet computer-based, self-administered questionnaires among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including stage 5 CKD treated with renal replacement therapies (RRT) (either dialysis or transplant).

methodsWe enrolled a convenience sample of patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD (including patients on dialysis or after kidney transplant) in a single-centre, cross-sectional pilot study. Participants completed validated questionnaires programmed on an electronic data capture system (DADOS, Techna Inc., Toronto) on tablet computers. The primary objective was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of using tablet-based electronic data capture in patients with CKD. Descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact test and multivariable logistic regression models were used for data analysis.

resultsOne hundred and twenty one patients (55% male, mean age (± SD) of 58 (±14) years, 49% Caucasian) participated in the study. Ninety-two percent of the respondents indicated that the computer tablet was acceptable and 79% of the participants required no or minimal help for completing the questionnaires. Acceptance of tablets was lower among patients 70 years or older (75% vs. 95%; p = 0.011) and with little previous computer experience (81% vs. 96%; p = 0.05). Furthermore, a greater level of assistance was more frequently required by patients who were older (45% vs. 15%; p = 0.009), had lower level of education (33% vs. 14%; p = 0.027), low health literacy (79% vs. 12%; p = 0.027), and little previous experience with computers (52% vs. 10%; p = 0.027).

conclusionsTablet computer-based electronic data capture to administer PROMs was acceptable and feasible for most respondents and could therefore be used to systematically assess PROMs among patients with CKD. Special consideration should focus on elderly patients with little previous computer experience, since they may require more assistance with completion.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal Replacement TherapyAdultAgedAge FactorsComputers, HandheldCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementCKDDiabetesElectronic data capturePatient reported outcome measures (PROMs)Pilot studySelf-administered questionnairesTablet computers

Identifiers

PMID29212466
PMCPMC5719517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.