Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212448›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

From genomes to genotypes: molecular epidemiological analysis of Chlamydia gallinacea reveals a high level of genetic diversity for this newly emerging chlamydial pathogen.

Weina Guo, Martina Jelocnik, Jing Li, Konrad Sachse, Adam Polkinghorne, Yvonne Pannekoek, Bernhard Kaltenboeck, Jiansen Gong, Jinfeng You, Chengming Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chlamydia gallinacea in Brazilian backyard chicken farms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome organization and genomics inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Severe community-acquired pneumonia caused byEmerging microbes & infections · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Genome Analysis of 33Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Weina GuoJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, People's Republic of China.
Martina JelocnikCentre for Animal Health Innovation, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.
Jing LiJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, People's Republic of China.
Konrad SachseInstitute of Bioinformatics, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Adam PolkinghorneCentre for Animal Health Innovation, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.
Yvonne PannekoekDepartment of Microbiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernhard KaltenboeckCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Jiansen GongPoultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jinfeng YouJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, People's Republic of China.
Chengming WangJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, People's Republic of China. wangche@auburn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-8340
Yangzhou University · CNUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUAnhui University of Science and Technology · CNAuburn University · USFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEPoultry Research Institute · CNUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia (C.) gallinacea is a recently identified bacterium that mainly infects domestic chickens. Demonstration of C. gallinacea in human atypical pneumonia suggests its zoonotic potential. Its prevalence in chickens exceeds that of C. psittaci, but genetic and genomic research on C. gallinacea is still at the beginning. In this study, we conducted whole-genome sequencing of C. gallinacea strain JX-1 isolated from an asymptomatic chicken, and comparative genomic analysis between C. gallinacea strains and related chlamydial species.

resultsThe genome of C. gallinacea JX-1 was sequenced by single-molecule, real-time technology and is comprised of a 1,059,522-bp circular chromosome with an overall G + C content of 37.93% and sequence similarity of 99.4% to type strain 08-1274/3. In addition, a plasmid designated pJX-1, almost identical to p1274 of the type strain, except for two point mutations, was only found in field strains from chicken, but not in other hosts. In contrast to chlamydial species with notably variable polymorphic membrane protein (pmp) genes and plasticity zone (PZ), these regions were conserved in both C. gallinacea strains. There were 15 predicted pmp genes, but only B, A, E1, H, G1 and G2 were apparently intact in both strains. In comparison to chlamydial species where the PZ may be up to 50 kbp, C. gallinacea strains displayed gene content reduction in the PZ (14 kbp), with strain JX-1 having a premature STOP codon in the cytotoxin (tox) gene, while tox gene is intact in the type strain. In multilocus sequence typing (MLST), 15 C. gallinacea STs were identified among 25 strains based on cognate MLST allelic profiles of the concatenated sequences. The type strain and all Chinese strains belong to two distinct phylogenetic clades. Clade of the Chinese strains separated into 14 genetically distinct lineages, thus revealing considerable genetic diversity of C. gallinacea strains in China.

conclusionsIn this first detailed comparative genomic analysis of C. gallinacea, we have provided evidence for substantial genetic diversity among C. gallinacea strains. How these genetic polymorphisms affect C. gallinacea biology and pathogenicity should be addressed in future studies that focus on phylogenetics and host adaption of this enigmatic bacterial agent.

Indexed as

ChickensGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialAnimalsBacterial ProteinsChinaChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsGenotypeMolecular EpidemiologyMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyPoultry DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsChlamydia gallinaceaComparative genomics analysisMLSTPhylogenetic analysisWhole-genome sequence

Identifiers

PMID29212448
PMCPMC5717833
OpenAlexW2772360615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.