Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212284›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Systematic review and critique of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer.

Francesca Moretti, Paola D'Antona, Emanuele Finardi, Marco Barbetta, Lorenzo Dominioni, Albino Poli, Elisabetta Gini, Douglas M Noonan, Andrea Imperatori, Nicola Rotolo and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Development of a serum miRNA panel for detection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MorettiDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paola D'AntonaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, DBSV, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Emanuele FinardiDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco BarbettaDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo DominioniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, DMS, Center for Thoracic Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Albino PoliDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisabetta GiniDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, DBSV, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Douglas M NoonanDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, DBSV, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Andrea ImperatoriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, DMS, Center for Thoracic Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Nicola RotoloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, DMS, Center for Thoracic Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Maria CattoniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, DMS, Center for Thoracic Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Paola CampomenosiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, DBSV, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
University of Insubria · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selected circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been suggested for non-invasive screening of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however the numerous proposed miRNA signatures are inconsistent. Aiming to identify miRNAs suitable specifically for stage I-II NSCLC screening in serum/plasma samples, we searched the databases "Pubmed", "Medline", "Scopus", "Embase" and "WOS" and systematically reviewed the publications reporting quantitative data on the efficacy [sensitivity, specificity and/or area under the curve (AUC)] of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of NSCLC stage I and/or II. The 20 studies fulfilling the search criteria included 1110 NSCLC patients and 1009 controls, and were of medium quality according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist. In these studies, the patient cohorts as well as the control groups were heterogeneous for demographics and clinicopathological characteristics; moreover, numerous pre-analytical and analytical variables likely influenced miRNA determinations, and potential bias of hemolysis was often underestimated. We identified four circulating miRNAs scarcely influenced by hemolysis, each featuring high sensitivity (> 80%) and AUC (> 0.80) as biomarkers of stage I-II NSCLC: miR-223, miR-20a, miR-448 and miR-145; four other miRNAs showed high specificity (> 90%): miR-628-3p, miR-29c, miR-210 and miR-1244. In a model of two-step screening for stage I-II NSCLC using first the above panel of serum miRNAs with high sensitivity and high AUC, and subsequently the panel with high specificity, the estimated overall sensitivity is 91.6% and overall specificity is 93.4%. These and other circulating miRNAs suggested for stage I-II NSCLC screening require validation in multiple independent studies before they can be proposed for clinical application.

Indexed as

biomarkerscirculatingmicroRNAnon-small cell lung cancerstage I-II NSCLC

Identifiers

PMID29212284
PMCPMC5706930
OpenAlexW2763189604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.