Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212194›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Association between miR-31-3p expression and cetuximab efficacy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a post-hoc analysis of the New EPOC trial.

Siân Pugh, Raphaële Thiébaut, John Bridgewater, Marie-Lise Grisoni, Karwan Moutasim, Francis Rousseau, Gareth J Thomas, Gareth Griffiths, François Liebaert, John Primrose and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. MiR-31 as a predictive biomarker of cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Oncology reviews · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Siân PughUniversity Surgery, Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Raphaële ThiébautIntegraGen SA, Evry, France.
John BridgewaterUCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Marie-Lise GrisoniIntegraGen SA, Evry, France.
Karwan MoutasimCancer Sciences Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Francis RousseauIntegraGen SA, Evry, France.
Gareth J ThomasCancer Sciences Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
François LiebaertIntegraGen SA, Evry, France.
John PrimroseUniversity Surgery, Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Pierre Laurent-PuigUMR-S1147, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
University of Southampton · GBIntegraGen (France) · FRCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBDélégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10549Cancer Research UK 15956Cancer Research UK 7275Medical Research Council MR/M018423/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh miR-31-3p expression is associated with inferior outcomes in KRAS wild-type (WT) advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy. This study evaluated miR-31-3p expression in patients with operable colorectal liver metastases (LM) enrolled in the New EPOC study.

methodsMiR-31-3p expression was measured in primary tumors (PT) from 149 KRAS WT patients including 71 receiving chemotherapy alone (CT) and 78 receiving chemotherapy plus cetuximab (CTX). Each treatment arm was split into tertiles based on miR-31-3p expression levels. MiR-31-3p expression was also measured in LM from 94 patients with tumor tissue available.

resultsThe median progression-free survival for the combined populations with mid or high miR-31-3p expression was shorter in the CTX versus the CT arm (26.7 months versus 12.3 months, HR=2.28 95%CI 1.27; 4.09 p=0.006). Low miR-31-3p expressers had similar outcomes irrespective of treatment (HR=1.06 95%CI 0.43; 2.61 p=0.9). MiR-31-3p expression was correlated between paired PT and LM samples in the CT group but not in the CTX group.

conclusionsPatients with low miR-31-3p expression in the New EPOC study were not harmed by the addition of cetuximab. This supports miR-31-3p as a promising predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS WT advanced colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

anti-EGFRbiomarkercetuximabmetastatic colorectal cancermiR-31-3p

Identifiers

PMID29212194
PMCPMC5706840
OpenAlexW2758868699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.