Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29212070›Full record

ReviewGerontology2018

Aging and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Framework for Future Research - A Mini-Review.

Corinna E Löckenhoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gerontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age and Framing Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overconfidence and Financial Risk Tolerance in Older Age.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive and Emotional Factors Influencing the Incorporation of Advice Into Decision Making Across the Adult Lifespan.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Change in Decision-Making Analysis and Preferences in Old Age.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Corinna E LöckenhoffDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age differences in decision-making are of theoretical interest and have important practical implications, but relevant lines of work are distributed across multiple disciplines and often lack integration. The present review proposes an overarching conceptual framework with the aim of connecting disjointed aspects of this field of research. The framework builds on process models of decision-making and specifies potential mechanisms behind age effects as well as relevant moderators including task characteristics and contextual factors. After summarizing the extant literature for each aspect of the framework, compensatory mechanisms and ecological fit between different components of the model are considered. Implications for real-life decision-making, remaining research gaps, and directions for future research are discussed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAgingCognitionDecision Support TechniquesEmotionsFunctional NeuroimagingGeriatricsHumansMotivationResearch DesignSocial EnvironmentAge differenceDecision-making

Identifiers

PMID29212070
PMCPMC5828978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.