ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2018
Insights from resolving protein-DNA interactions at near base-pair resolution.
Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single cell imaging reveals cisplatin regulating interactions between transcription (co)factors and DNA.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Biochemical characteristics of the chondrocyte-enriched SNORC protein and its transcriptional regulation by SOX9.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis of ChIP-exo peak-callers: impact of data quality, read duplication and binding subtypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Epigenetic and transcriptional profiling of triple negative breast cancer.Scientific data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
One of the central goals in molecular biology is to understand how cell-type-specific expression patterns arise through selective recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to a subset of gene promoters. Pol II needs to be recruited to a precise genomic position at the proper time to produce messenger RNA from a DNA template. Ostensibly, transcription is a relatively simple cellular process; yet, experimentally measuring and then understanding the combinatorial possibilities of transcriptional regulators remain a daunting task. Since its introduction in 1985, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) has remained a key tool for investigating protein-DNA contacts in vivo. Over 30 years of intensive research using ChIP have provided numerous insights into mechanisms of gene regulation. As functional genomic technologies improve, they present new opportunities to address key biological questions. ChIP-exo is a refined version of ChIP-seq that significantly reduces background signal, while providing near base-pair mapping resolution for protein-DNA interactions. This review discusses the evolution of the ChIP assay over the years; the methodological differences between ChIP-seq, ChIP-exo and ChIP-nexus; and highlight new insights into epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms that were uniquely enabled with the near base-pair resolution of ChIP-exo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.