Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211792›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The prognostic role of tumor size in early breast cancer in the era of molecular biology.

Anaid Anna Kasangian, Giorgio Gherardi, Elena Biagioli, Valter Torri, Anna Moretti, Elena Bernardin, Andrea Cordovana, Gabriella Farina, Annalisa Bramati, Sheila Piva and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anaid Anna KasangianASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Breast Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GherardiASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Pathology, Milan, Italy.
Elena BiagioliIRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Laboratory of Methodology for Biomedical Research, Milan, Italy.
Valter TorriIRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Laboratory of Methodology for Biomedical Research, Milan, Italy.
Anna MorettiASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-5734
Elena BernardinASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Breast Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CordovanaASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Breast Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella FarinaASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Annalisa BramatiASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Sheila PivaASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Maria Chiara DazzaniASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Emanuela PaternòASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Nicla Maria La VerdeASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco PO Fatebenefratelli Department of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of early breast cancer (EBC) depends on patient and tumor characteristics. The association between tumor size, the largest diameter in TNM staging, and prognosis is well recognized. According to TNM, tumors classified as T2, could have very different volumes; e.g. a tumor of 2.1 cm has a volume of 4500 mm3, while a tumor of 4.9 cm has a volume of 60.000 mm3 even belonging to the same class. The aim of the study is to establish if the prognostic role of tumor size, expressed as diameter and volume, has been overshadowed by other factors.

methodsThe primary objective is to evaluate the association between tumor dimensions and overall survival (OS) / disease free survival (DFS), in our institution from January 1st 2005 to September 30th 2013 in a surgical T1-T2 population. Volume was evaluated with the measurement of three half-diameters of the tumor (a, b and c), and calculated using the following formula: 4/3π x a x b x c.

results341 patients with T1-T2 EBC were included. 86.5% were treated with conservative surgery. 85.1% had a Luminal subtype, 9.1% were Triple negative and 7.4% were HER2 positive. Median volume was 942 mm3 (range 0.52-31.651.2). 44 patients (12.9%) relapsed and 23 patients died. With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the univariate analysis for DFS showed an association between age, tumor size, volume, histological grading and molecular subtype. The multivariate analysis confirmed the statistically significant association only for molecular subtype (p 0.005), with a worse prognosis for Triple negative and HER2 positive subtypes compared with Luminal (HR: 2.65; 95%CI: 1.34-5.22). Likewise for OS, an association was shown by the multivariate analysis solely for molecular subtype (HER2 and Triple negative vs. Luminal. HR: 2.83; 95% CI:1.46-5.49; p 0.002).

conclusionsIn our study, the only parameter that strongly influences survival is molecular subtype. These findings encourage clinicians to choose adjuvant treatment not based on dimensional criteria but on biological features.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29211792
PMCPMC5718505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.