Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211780›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in water samples in central Italy and molecular characterization of oprD in imipenem resistant isolates.

Giuditta Fiorella Schiavano, Elisa Carloni, Francesca Andreoni, Silvia Magi, Maria Chironna, Giorgio Brandi, Giulia Amagliani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antibiotic Resistance toJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial Activity ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuditta Fiorella SchiavanoDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Toxicological, Hygienistic and Environmental Sciences Unit, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-3486
Elisa CarloniDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Section of Biotechnology, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Fano, PU, Italy.
Francesca AndreoniDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Section of Biotechnology, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Fano, PU, Italy.
Silvia MagiDipartimento provinciale ARPAM di Pesaro, Servizio Acque, Pesaro, Italy.
Maria ChironnaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology-Hygiene Section, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giorgio BrandiDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Toxicological, Hygienistic and Environmental Sciences Unit, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy.
Giulia AmaglianiDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Toxicological, Hygienistic and Environmental Sciences Unit, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, PU, Italy.
University of Urbino · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scopeThis study aimed to analyse the prevalence, antibiotic resistance and genetic relatedness of P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from potable and recreational water samples (n. 8,351) collected from different settings (swimming pools, n. 207; healthcare facilities, n 1,684; accommodation facilities, n. 1,518; municipal waterworks, n. 4,500; residential buildings, n. 235). Possible mechanisms underlying resistance to imipenem, with particular focus on those involving oprD-based uptake, were also explored. METHODS AND

resultsIsolation and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was performed according to the standardized procedure UNI EN ISO 16266:2008 followed by PCR confirmation. Antibiotic Susceptibility testing was conducted according to EUCAST standardized disk diffusion method. Genetic relatedness of strains was carried out by RAPD. The sequence of the oprD gene was analyzed by standard method. Fifty-three samples (0.63%) were positive for P. aeruginosa, of which 10/207 (4.83%) were from swimming pools. Five isolates (9.43%) were resistant to imipenem, one to Ticarcillin + Clavulanate, one to both Piperacillin and Ticarcillin + Clavulanate. The highest isolation rate of imipenem resistant P. aeruginosa was observed in swimming pool water. Identical RAPD profiles were found in isolates from the same location in the same year or even in different years.

conclusionsImipenem resistant strains were identified as carbapenemase-negative and resistance has been associated with inactivating mutations within the oprD gene, with a concomitant loss of porin. RAPD results proved that a water system can remain colonized by one strain for long periods and the contamination may be difficult to eradicate. This study has revealed the presence of P. aeruginosa in different water samples, including resistant strains, especially in swimming pools, and confirmed the role of porins as a contributing factor in carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialImipenemItalyMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPorinsPseudomonas aeruginosaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenemOprD protein, Pseudomonas aeruginosaPorins

Identifiers

PMID29211780
PMCPMC5718518
OpenAlexW2773154260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.