Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211716›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil.

Mukan Ji, Chris Greening, Inka Vanwonterghem, Carlo R Carere, Sean K Bay, Jason A Steen, Kate Montgomery, Thomas Lines, John Beardall, Josie van Dorst and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ATP synthesis driven by atmospheric hydrogen concentrations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mukan JiSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Chris GreeningSchool of Biological Sciences, Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Inka VanwonterghemAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Carlo R CarereGNS Science, Wairakei Research Centre, 114 Karetoto Road, Wairakei, Taupō 3384, New Zealand.
Sean K BaySchool of Biological Sciences, Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Jason A SteenAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Kate MontgomerySchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Thomas LinesSchool of Biological Sciences, Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
John BeardallSchool of Biological Sciences, Centre for Geometric Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Josie van DorstSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Ian SnapeAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia.
Matthew B StottGNS Science, Wairakei Research Centre, 114 Karetoto Road, Wairakei, Taupō 3384, New Zealand.
Philip HugenholtzAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Belinda C FerrariSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, New South Wales 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivation-independent surveys have shown that the desert soils of Antarctica harbour surprisingly rich microbial communities. Given that phototroph abundance varies across these Antarctic soils, an enduring question is what supports life in those communities with low photosynthetic capacity. Here we provide evidence that atmospheric trace gases are the primary energy sources of two Antarctic surface soil communities. We reconstructed 23 draft genomes from metagenomic reads, including genomes from the candidate bacterial phyla WPS-2 and AD3. The dominant community members encoded and expressed high-affinity hydrogenases, carbon monoxide dehydrogenases, and a RuBisCO lineage known to support chemosynthetic carbon fixation. Soil microcosms aerobically scavenged atmospheric H

Indexed as

Carbon CycleDesert ClimateSoil MicrobiologyAntarctic RegionsAtmosphereCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideEcosystemExobiologyGenomeHydrogenMetagenomicsOxidation-ReductionPhotosynthesisPhylogenySoilCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideHydrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID29211716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.