Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211650›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2018

Selective Interference with Syntactic Encoding during Sentence Production by Direct Electrocortical Stimulation of the Inferior Frontal Gyrus.

Edward F Chang, Garret Kurteff, Stephen M Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuroplasticity in F16 fighter jet pilots.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  16. A Neurosurgical Functional Dissection of the Middle Precentral Gyrus during Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward F ChangUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Garret KurteffUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Stephen M WilsonVanderbilt University Medical Center.

Funding

Functional organization of the superior temporal gyrus for speech perceptionR01DC012379 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Edward Chang · 2012 to 2026
$8.3M
Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
Functional Architecture of Speech Motor CortexU01NS098971 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, EDWARD · 2016 to 2018
$3.5M
Neocortical Mechanisms of Categorical Speech PerceptionR00NS065120 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, EDWARD · 2010 to 2012
$729k
An Adaptive Semantic Paradigm for Valid and Reliable Language Mapping in AphasiaR21DC016080 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, STEPHEN M · 2017 to 2018
$435k
Neocortical Mechanisms of Categorical Speech PerceptionK99NS065120 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, EDWARD · 2009 to 2009
$132k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012379NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016080NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS065120NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS065120NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical stimulation mapping (CSM) has provided important insights into the neuroanatomy of language because of its high spatial and temporal resolution, and the causal relationships that can be inferred from transient disruption of specific functions. Almost all CSM studies to date have focused on word-level processes such as naming, comprehension, and repetition. In this study, we used CSM to identify sites where stimulation interfered selectively with syntactic encoding during sentence production. Fourteen patients undergoing left-hemisphere neurosurgery participated in the study. In 7 of the 14 patients, we identified nine sites where cortical stimulation interfered with syntactic encoding but did not interfere with single word processing. All nine sites were localized to the inferior frontal gyrus, mostly to the pars triangularis and opercularis. Interference with syntactic encoding took several different forms, including misassignment of arguments to grammatical roles, misassignment of nouns to verb slots, omission of function words and inflectional morphology, and various paragrammatic constructions. Our findings suggest that the left inferior frontal gyrus plays an important role in the encoding of syntactic structure during sentence production.

Indexed as

LinguisticsAdultAgedBrain MappingCraniotomyElectric StimulationFemaleHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexSpeechVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29211650
PMCPMC5819756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.