Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211308›Full record

Trial reportCancer2018

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Gail J Roboz, Hagop M Kantarjian, Karen W L Yee, Patricia L Kropf, Casey L O'Connell, Elizabeth A Griffiths, Wendy Stock, Naval G Daver, Elias Jabbour, Ellen K Ritchie and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Roles of DNA Demethylases in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Hagop M KantarjianThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-3307
Karen W L YeePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia L KropfFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Casey L O'ConnellKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Elizabeth A GriffithsRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Wendy StockUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Naval G DaverThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Elias JabbourThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-4465-6119
Ellen K RitchieWeill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Katherine J WalshOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
David RizzieriDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Scott D LuninFlorida Cancer Specialist and Research Institute, Fort Myers, Florida.
Tania CurioWeill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Woonbok ChungFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yong HaoAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, California.
James N LowderAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4267-5447
Mohammad AzabAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, California.
Jean-Pierre J IssaFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Astex PharmaceuticalsNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTemple University · USDuke Medical Center · USFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are poor. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating agent, could be useful in treating such patients.

methodsIn this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 dose-expansion study, AML patients from 10 North American medical centers were first randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous guadecitabine at 60 or 90 mg/m

resultsBetween June 15, 2012, and August 19, 2013, 108 patients with previously treated AML consented to enroll in the study, and 103 of these patients were treated; 5 patients did not receive the study treatment. A total of 103 patients were included in the safety and efficacy analyses (24 and 26 patients who were randomly assigned to 60 and 90 mg/m

conclusionsGuadecitabine has promising clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile and thus warrants further development in this population. Cancer 2018;124:325-34. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAzacitidineDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceAzacitidineguadecitabineacute myeloid leukemia (AML)guadecitabinerefractoryrelapsedSGI-110

Identifiers

PMID29211308
PMCPMC5814873
OpenAlexW2771414232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.