Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211306›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter alterations across cancer types as detected by next-generation sequencing: A clinical and molecular analysis of 423 patients.

Maria Schwaederle, Nithya Krishnamurthy, Gregory A Daniels, David E Piccioni, Santosh Kesari, Paul T Fanta, Richard B Schwab, Sandip P Patel, Barbara A Parker, Razelle Kurzrock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of co-occurring mutations inFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Regulation of Gene Expression by Telomere Position Effect.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic applications of trans-splicing.British medical bulletin · 2020
    Article
  11. Adult diffuse midline gliomas: Clinical, radiological, and genetic characteristics.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Neuro-oncology advances
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria SchwaederleCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
Nithya KrishnamurthyCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-7506
Gregory A DanielsCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
David E PiccioniCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-0126
Santosh KesariDepartment of Translational Neuro-Oncology and Neurotherapeutics, John Wayne Cancer Institute and Pacific Neuroscience Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California.
Paul T FantaCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
Richard B SchwabCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
Sandip P PatelCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
Barbara A ParkerCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
Razelle KurzrockCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California.
UC San Diego Health System · USSaint John's Health Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations that may affect telomerase activity have recently been described in human malignancies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical correlates of TERT promoter abnormalities in a large cohort of patients with diverse cancers.

methodsThis study analyzed TERT promoter alterations and clinical characteristics of 423 consecutive patients for whom molecular testing by next-generation sequencing was performed between August 2014 and July 2015.

resultsOf the 423 patients, 61 (14.4%) had TERT promoter mutations, and this placed TERT promoter alterations among the most prevalent aberrations after tumor protein 53 (TP53; 39%) and KRAS and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) alterations (15% each) in this population. TERT promoter alterations were more frequent in men (P = .031) and were associated with brain cancers (P = .001), skin cancers/melanoma (P = .001), and a higher number of aberrations (P = .0001). A co-alteration analysis found that TERT promoter alterations were significantly correlated with CDKN2A/B (P = .001) and BRAF abnormalities (P = .0003). Patients harboring TERT promoter alterations or TP53 or CDKN2A/B alterations and those with 4 or more alterations demonstrated shorter survival (hazard ratio for normal TERT promoters vs aberrant ones, 0.44; P = .017). However, only a higher number of alterations remained significant in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionsOverall, TERT promoter alterations were among the most prevalent aberrations in this population, with very high rates in brain cancers (48% of patients) and melanomas (56% of patients). These aberrations frequently coexist with a high number of other aberrations, with the latter feature also significantly associated with poorer overall survival. Therapeutic options for targeting tumors with TERT promoter mutations are currently limited, although a variety of novel approaches are under development. Cancer 2018;124:1288-96. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

MutationPromoter Regions, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTelomeraseBiomarkers, TumorTelomeraseTERT protein, humanBRAFglioblastomamelanomasnext-generation sequencingsurvivaltelomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations

Identifiers

PMID29211306
PMCPMC5839978
OpenAlexW2775575873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.