Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29211054›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Barriers and Facilitators for Information Exchange during Over-The-Counter Consultations in Community Pharmacy: A Focus Group Study.

Liza J Seubert, Kerry Whitelaw, Fabienne Boeni, Laetitia Hattingh, Margaret C Watson, Rhonda M Clifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Barriers and Facilitators to Medicines Use in Patients With Vision Impairment: A Theory-Informed Qualitative Study of Patients and Caregivers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of patient counselling on the common cold treatment at Slovak community pharmacies using mystery shopping.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Trends in Pharmacy Practice Communication Research.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liza J SeubertDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. liza.seubert@uwa.edu.au.
Kerry WhitelawDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. kerry.whitelaw@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-0837
Fabienne BoeniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland. fabienne.boeni@unibas.ch.
Laetitia HattinghSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia. L.Hattingh@curtin.edu.au.
Margaret C WatsonDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, 5W 3.33, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK. m.c.watson@bath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-9273
Rhonda M CliffordDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. rhonda.clifford@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers are confident managing minor ailments through self-care, often self-medicating from a range of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines available from community pharmacies. To minimise risks, pharmacy personnel endeavour to engage in a consultation when consumers present with OTC enquiries however they find consumers resistant. The aim was to determine stakeholder perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators for information exchange during OTC consultations in community pharmacies and to understand the elicited themes in behavioural terms. Focus groups were undertaken with community pharmacist, pharmacy assistant and consumer participants. Independent duplicate analysis of transcription data was conducted using inductive and framework methods. Eight focus groups involving 60 participants were conducted. Themes that emerged indicated consumers did not understand pharmacists' professional role, they were less likely to exchange information if asking for a specific product than if asking about symptom treatment, and they wanted privacy. Consumers were confident to self-diagnose and did not understand OTC medicine risks. Pharmacy personnel felt a duty of care to ensure consumer safety, and that with experience communication skills developed to better engage consumers in consultations. They also identified the need for privacy. Consumers need education about community pharmacists' role and responsibilities to motivate them to engage in OTC consultations. They also require privacy when doing so.

Indexed as

communicationfocus groupnonprescription drugsover-the-counter drugspharmacistspharmacy

Identifiers

PMID29211054
PMCPMC5748546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.