Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29210009›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2018

Influence of comorbidities on the implementation of the fundus examination in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Taichi Kawamura, Izumi Sato, Hiroshi Tamura, Yoko M Nakao, Koji Kawakami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology studies with real-world databases.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taichi KawamuraDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Izumi SatoDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Hiroshi TamuraDivision of Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yoko M NakaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiologic Informatics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan.
Koji KawakamiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. kawakami.koji.4e@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the influence of comorbidities on undergoing a diabetic eye examination in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

designRetrospective cohort study

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using data from health insurance claims made between January 2005 and March 2013 in Japan. The primary outcome was implementation of the fundus examination that includes fundus photography, ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography by a doctor within one year of initial drug therapy for Type2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). We used multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for demographic parameters to investigate the influence of comorbidities (hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia) on patients with T2DM receiving fundus examinations. We conducted an additional analysis to investigate whether the site of treatment might influence the performance of fundus examinations in patients with T2DM.

resultsA total of 6,492 patients were eligible for this analysis, of which 1,044 (16.1%) had comorbidities and 2,212 (34.1%) received the fundus examination. In the multivariable analysis, there was a significant association between comorbidities and a lower proportion of examination implementation (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.68; P<0.001). The implementation proportion for patients treated for comorbidities and T2DM in the same facility was also low (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43-0.63; P<0.001).

conclusionsThese results suggest that the proportion of taking fundus examination is low among patients with comorbidities, especially in patients treated at the same facility for comorbidities and T2DM. This may help to increase the proportion of T2DM patients receiving fundus examinations.

Indexed as

Fundus OculiPhysical ExaminationAgedCohort StudiesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansHyperlipidemiasHypertensionInsurance, HealthJapanMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmoscopyClaims dataComorbidityDiabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyEye examination

Identifiers

PMID29210009
OpenAlexW2772360173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.