SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018
Haze and health impacts in ASEAN countries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time series analysis of environmental factors and their association with emergency visits for asthma exacerbations in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Interaction effects of outdoor thermal comfort and air pollution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association betweenScientific reports · 2024Article
- Inflammatory response in mouse lungs to haze episodes under different backgrounds of particulate matter exposure.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Wildfires and Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Impacts, Risks, and Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- In vitro exposure to benzo[a]pyrene damages the developing mouse ovary.Reproduction & fertility · 2023Article
- Disease burden of migraine and tension-type headache in non-high-income East and Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2019.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Article
- Clustering of Environmental Parameters and the Risk of Acute Ischaemic Stroke.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Clustering of Environmental Parameters and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Air-Pollution Control in an Emergent Market: Does It Work? Evidence from Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- AQVx-An Interactive Visual Display System for Air Pollution and Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Acute Health Impacts of the Southeast Asian Transboundary Haze Problem-A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Fires, Smoke Exposure, and Public Health: An Integrative Framework to Maximize Health Benefits From Peatland Restoration.GeoHealth · 2019Article
- Psychosomatic symptoms during South East Asian haze crisis are related to changes in cerebral hemodynamics.PloS one · 2019Article
- Relationships between Meteorological Parameters and Particulate Matter in Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seasonal haze episodes and the associated inimical health impacts have become a regular crisis among the ASEAN countries. Even though many emerging experimental and epidemiological studies have documented the plausible health effects of the predominating toxic pollutants of haze, the consistency among the reported findings by these studies is poorly understood. By addressing such gap, this review aimed to critically highlight the evidence of physical and psychological health impacts of haze from the available literature in ASEAN countries. Systematic literature survey from six electronic databases across the environmental and medical disciplines was performed, and 20 peer-reviewed studies out of 384 retrieved articles were selected. The evidence pertaining to the health impacts of haze based on field survey, laboratory tests, modelling and time-series analysis were extracted for expert judgement. In specific, no generalization can be made on the reported physical symptoms as no specific symptoms recorded in all the reviewed studies except for throat discomfort. Consistent evidence was found for the increase in respiratory morbidity, especially for asthma, whilst the children and the elderly are deemed to be the vulnerable groups of the haze-induced respiratory ailments. A consensual conclusion on the association between the cardiovascular morbidity and haze is unfeasible as the available studies are scanty and geographically limited albeit of some reported increased cases. A number of modelling and simulation studies demonstrated elevating respiratory mortality rates due to seasonal haze exposures over the years. Besides, evidence on cancer risk is inconsistent where industrial and vehicular emissions are also expected to play more notable roles than mere haze exposure. There are insufficient regional studies to examine the association between the mental health and haze. Limited toxicological studies in ASEAN countries often impede a comprehensive understanding of the biological mechanism of haze-induced toxic pollutants on human physiology. Therefore, the lack of consistent evidence among the reported haze-induced health effects as highlighted in this review calls for more intensive longitudinal and toxicological studies with greater statistical power to disseminate more reliable and congruent findings to empower the institutional health planning among the ASEAN countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29209970What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.