Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209949›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019

Kjersti Johnsrud, Karolina Skagen, Therese Seierstad, Mona Skjelland, David Russell, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis with PET: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Positron emission tomography for diagnosing cerebrovascular disorders: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pericarotid Fat as a Marker of Cerebrovascular Risk.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Comparison of SUVNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Diagnostics of atherosclerosis: Overview of the existing methods.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Multimodality molecular imaging: Gaining insights into the mechanisms linking chronic stress to cardiovascular disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Technical considerations for quantification ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Inter-reader agreement ofJRSM cardiovascular disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kjersti JohnsrudDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. kjersti@slogum.no.
Karolina SkagenDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Therese SeierstadDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Mona SkjellandDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
David RussellInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Postbox 1171, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Mona-Elisabeth RevheimDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is currently no consensus on the methodology for quantification of METHODS AND

resultsForty-four patients with atherosclerotic stenosis ≥70% of the internal carotid artery underwent

conclusionsIn large stenotic carotid plaques,

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedCarotid StenosisCohort StudiesEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticPredictive Value of TestsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET/CTatherosclerosiscarotid plaqueinflammationquantification method

Identifiers

PMID29209949
PMCPMC6517604
OpenAlexW2771880583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.