Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209794›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2018

Advances in therapeutic bacterial antisense biotechnology.

John P Hegarty, David B Stewart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Liposomes as delivery vectors for nucleic acid mimics intoFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanotech meets antibiotics: nucleotide antibiotics delivered by lipid nanoparticles.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Chemical strategies for antisense antibiotics.Chemical Society reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John P HegartyCollege of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, H137, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033-0850, USA.
David B StewartCollege of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, H137, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033-0850, USA. dstewart@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Cationic Bolaamphiphiles (CAB) and Phosphorothioate Gapmers as Antisense Therapy for C. difficileR21AI132353 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SHARMA, ARUN K, STEWART, DAVID B. · 2017 to 2018
$422k
National Institutes of Health R21AI132353NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI132353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antisense therapeutics are a biotechnological form of antibiotic therapy using chemical analogues of short single-stranded nucleic acid sequences modified to form stable oligomers. These molecules are termed antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) because their sequence is complementary, via Watson-Crick specific base pairing, to their target messenger RNA (mRNA). ASOs modify gene expression in this sequence-dependent manner by binding to its complementary mRNA and inhibiting its translation into protein through steric blockage and/or through RNase degradation of the ASO/RNA duplex. The widespread use of conventional antibiotics has led to the increasing emergence of multiple drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. There is an urgent need to develop alternative therapeutic strategies to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial infections, and until recently, the use of ASOs as therapeutic agents has been essentially limited to eukaryotic cells, with ASOs as antibacterials having been largely unexplored primarily due to the poor uptake efficiency of antisense molecules by bacteria. There are conceptual advantages to bacterial antisense antibiotic therapies, including a sequence-dependent approach that allows for a rational design to multiple specific molecular targets. This review summarizes the current knowledge of antisense bacterial biotechnology and highlights the recent progress and the current obstacles in their development for therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBase PairingBiotechnologyDrug Resistance, BacterialOligonucleotides, AntisenseRibonucleasesRNA, MessengerAnti-Bacterial AgentsOligonucleotides, AntisenseRibonucleasesRNA, MessengerAntisenseBacteriaBiotechnologyTherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID29209794
PMCPMC5777866
OpenAlexW2773471937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.