Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209746›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2018

Decisional conflict in mental health care: a cross-sectional study.

Margot J Metz, Marjolein A Veerbeek, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Edwin de Beurs, Aartjan T F Beekman

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community treatment orders and care planning: How is engagement and decision-making enacted?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Margot J MetzGGz Breburg, Postbus 770, 5000, AT, Tilburg, The Netherlands. m.metz@ggzbreburg.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-6276
Marjolein A VeerbeekTrimbos Institute, Postbus 725, 3500, AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christina M van der Feltz-CornelisGGz Breburg, Postbus 770, 5000, AT, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Edwin de BeursFoundation for Benchmarking Mental Health Care, Rembrandtlaan 46, 3723, BK, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Aartjan T F BeekmanGGZ inGeest, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081, HL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGz Breburg · NLGGZ inGeest · NLLeiden University · NLTilburg University · NLTrimbos Institute · NL

Funding

National Network for Quality Development in mental health care PV140003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDecisional conflict refers to the degree to which patients are engaged in and feel comfortable about important clinical decisions. Until now, the concept has received little attention in mental health care. We investigate the level of decisional conflict in mental health care and whether this is influenced by socio-demographics, treatment setting, diagnoses, and locus of control.

methodsCross-sectional study among 186 patients in Dutch specialist mental health care using the Decisional Conflict Scale, which measures five dimensions of decisional conflict: information, support, clarification of values, certainty, and decisional quality. Descriptive statistics and forward stepwise linear regression analyses were used.

resultsPatients report relatively high levels of decisional conflict, especially those with more external locus of control. Having a personality disorder and higher education also increases decisional conflict on the dimensions support and clarification of values, respectively. Less decisional conflict was experienced by patients with psychotic disorders on the dimension certainty and by women on the information domain.

conclusionsDecisional conflict is common among patients in specialist mental health care and is very useful for assessing the quality of clinical decision making. Measuring decisional conflict and knowledge about influencing factors can be used to improve patients' participation in clinical decision making, adherence to treatment and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalPatient ParticipationAdultClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsCross-sectional studyDecisional conflictDecisional Conflict ScaleMental health careShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID29209746
OpenAlexW2775247016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.