Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2017

Evaluation of Phenolic Phytochemical Enriched Commercial Plant Extracts on the

Allie Brown, Danielle Anderson, Kenneth Racicot, Sarah J Pilkenton, Emmanouil Apostolidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of eggplant (Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allie BrownDepartment of Chemistry and Food Science, Framingham State University, Framingham, MA, United States.
Danielle AndersonCombat Feeding Directorate, Natick Solider Research, Development, and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA, United States.
Kenneth RacicotCombat Feeding Directorate, Natick Solider Research, Development, and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Natick, MA, United States.
Sarah J PilkentonDepartment of Chemistry and Food Science, Framingham State University, Framingham, MA, United States.
Emmanouil ApostolidisDepartment of Chemistry and Food Science, Framingham State University, Framingham, MA, United States.
Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center · USFramingham State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green tea (GT), cranberry (CR), and tart cherry extracts were evaluated for their ability to inhibit yeast α-glucosidase, relevant to glucose uptake. The total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant activity, and

Indexed as

antioxidantscranberry extractglucose managementglucosidase inhibitionphenolic phytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID29209613
PMCPMC5701620
OpenAlexW2767351339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.