Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209523›Full record

ReviewESMO open2017

Second-line treatments: moving towards an opportunity to improve survival in advanced gastric cancer?

Massimiliano Salati, Katia Di Emidio, Vittoria Tarantino, Stefano Cascinu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05029453 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study of Apatinib Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Second-line Gastric Cancer Receiving Prior Anti-PD-1 Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05029453 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study of Apatinib Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Second-line Gastric Cancer Receiving Prior Anti-PD-1 Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2021 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsGastric Cancer, Randomized Controlled StudyArmsApatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Expression of the immune checkpoint molecule V-set immunoglobulin domain-containing 4 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimiliano SalatiDepartment of Oncology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Katia Di EmidioDepartment of Oncology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Vittoria TarantinoDepartment of Oncology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Stefano CascinuDepartment of Oncology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Policlinico di Modena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death globally with approximately 723 000 deaths every year. Most patients present with advanced unresectable or metastatic disease, only amenable to palliative systemic treatment and a median survival uncommonly exceeding 12 months. Over the last years, the efficacy of chemotherapy combination has plateaued and the introduction of the anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 trastuzumab has resulted in a limited survival gain in the upfront setting. After this positive experience, first-line treatment with new targeted therapies failed to improve the outcome of advanced gastric cancer. On the contrary, second-line options, including monochemotherapy with taxanes or irinotecan and the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 ramucirumab, either alone or combined with paclitaxel, opened new therapeutic rooms for an ever-increasing number of patients who maintain an acceptable performance status across multiple lines. This article provides an updated overview on the current management of advanced gastric cancer and discusses how the different treatment options available may be best combined to favourably impact the outcome of patients following the logic of a treatment strategy.

Indexed as

advanced gastric cancerramucirumabtargeted therapytreatment strategy

Identifiers

PMID29209523
PMCPMC5703389
OpenAlexW2738699316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.