Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209204›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2017

Reward Circuitry Plasticity in Pain Perception and Modulation.

Marcos F DosSantos, Brenda de Souza Moura, Alexandre F DaSilva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neuropeptide Y and Pain: Insights from Brain Research.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Review
  11. Enhanced motor network engagement during reward gain anticipation in fibromyalgia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Reward system neurodynamics during menstrual pain modulated byFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Scalp electroacupuncture targeting the VTAFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcos F DosSantosLaboratório de Morfogênese Celular, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Brenda de Souza MouraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Radiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alexandre F DaSilvaHeadache and Orofacial Pain Effort, Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, Center for Human Growth and Development, Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

Investigation and Modulation of the Central Mu-Opioid Mechanism in Migraine (in vivo)R01NS094413 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALEXANDRE DASILVA · 2015 to 2026
$4.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pain is a widely known phenomenon and an important clinical symptom that occurs in numerous diseases, its mechanisms are still barely understood. Owing to the scarce information concerning its pathophysiology, particularly what is involved in the transition from an acute state to a chronic condition, pain treatment is frequently unsatisfactory, therefore contributing to the amplification of the chronic pain burden. In fact, pain is an extremely complex experience that demands the recruitment of an intricate set of central nervous system components. This includes cortical and subcortical areas involved in interpretation of the general characteristics of noxious stimuli. It also comprises neural circuits that process the motivational-affective dimension of pain. Hence, the reward circuitry represents a vital element for pain experience and modulation. This review article focuses on the interpretation of the extensive data available connecting the major components of the reward circuitry to pain suffering, including the nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, and the medial prefrontal cortex; with especial attention dedicated to the evaluation of neuroplastic changes affecting these structures found in chronic pain syndromes, such as migraine, trigeminal neuropathic pain, chronic back pain, and fibromyalgia.

Indexed as

chronic painmigrainenucleus accumbensprefrontal cortexreward circuitry

Identifiers

PMID29209204
PMCPMC5702349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.