Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209141›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2017

Co-expression network analysis identified FCER1G in association with progression and prognosis in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Liang Chen, Lushun Yuan, Yongzhi Wang, Gang Wang, Yuan Zhu, Rui Cao, Guofeng Qian, Conghua Xie, Xuefeng Liu, Yu Xiao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Liang ChenDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lushun YuanDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yongzhi WangDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yuan ZhuDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Rui CaoDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Guofeng QianDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Conghua XieDepartment of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xuefeng LiuDepartment of Pathology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington DC, USA.
Yu XiaoDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xinghuan WangDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CNGeorgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common solid lesion within kidney, and its prognostic is influenced by the progression covering a complex network of gene interactions. In current study, the microarray data GSE66272 containing ccRCC and adjacent normal tissues was analyzed to identify 4042 differentially expressed genes, on which weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed. Then 12 co-expressed gene modules were identified. The highest association was found between blue module and pathological stage (r = -0.77) by Pearson's correlation analysis. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that biological processes of blue module focused on inflammatory response, immune response, chemotaxis (all p < 1e-10). In the significant module, a total of 38 network hub genes were identified, FCER1G exhibited the highest correlation (r = 0.95) with ccRCC progression. In addition, FCER1G was hub node in the protein-protein interaction network of the genes in blue module as well. Thus, FCER1G was subsequently selected for validation. In the test set GSE53757 and RNA-sequencing data, FCER1G expression was also positively correlated with four stages of ccRCC progression (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that FCER1G could distinguish localized (pathological stage I, II) from non-localized (pathological stage III, IV) ccRCC (AUC=0.74, p < 0.001). Besides, FCER1G could be a prognostic gene in clinical practice as well, revealed by survival analysis based on RNA-sequencing data (p < 0.05). In conclusion, using weighted gene co-expression analysis, FCER1G was identified and validated in association with ccRCC progression and prognosis, which might improve the prognosis by influencing immune-related pathways.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidney NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptors, FcROC CurveSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorFCER1G, humanReceptors, Fcclear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)FCER1Gpathological stageprognosisReceiver operating characteristic (ROC).weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)

Identifiers

PMID29209141
PMCPMC5715520
OpenAlexW2770749057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.