ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2018
Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- What about sex, race(ism), and social determinants of health in neonatal outcomes?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- NICUs in the US: levels of acuity, number of beds, and relationships to population factors.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- Accuracy and Completeness of Intermediate-Level Nursery Descriptions on Hospital Websites.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Seven years later: state neonatal risk-appropriate care policy consistency with the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Article
- The center-effect on outcomes for infants born at less than 25 weeks.Seminars in perinatology · 2022Review
- Trends in neonatal intensive care unit admissions by race/ethnicity in the United States, 2008-2018.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Neonatal Mortality After Interhospital Transfer of Pregnant Women for Imminent Very Preterm Birth in Illinois.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Article
- Levels of Risk-Appropriate Care: Ensuring Women Deliver at the Right Place at the Right Time.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2020Article
- Racial Segregation and Inequality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for Very Low-Birth-Weight and Very Preterm Infants.JAMA pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCompare state policies with standards outlined in the 2012 AAP Policy Statement on Levels of Neonatal Care. STUDY
designSystematic, web-based review of publicly available policies on levels of care in all states in 2014. Infant risk information, equipment capabilities, and specialty staffing were abstracted from published rules, statutes, and regulations.
resultTwenty-two states had a policy on regionalized perinatal care. State policies vary in consistency with the AAP Policy, with 60% of states including standards consistent with Level I criteria, 48% Level II, 14% Level III, and one state with Level IV. Ventilation capability standards are highly consistent (66-100%), followed by imaging capability standards (50-90%). Policy language on specialty staffing (44-68%), and subspecialty staffing (39-50%) are moderately consistent.
conclusionState policies vary in consistency, a potentially significant barrier to monitoring, regulation, uniform care provision and measurement, and reporting of national-level measures on risk-appropriate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.