Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29208925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates.

Christian Scherer, Nicole Brennholt, Georg Reifferscheid, Martin Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 415 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epigenetic and Gene Expression Responses ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Social dominance influences individual susceptibility to an evolutionary trap in mosquitofish.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian SchererGoethe University Frankfurt/Main, Department Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, D-60323, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. c.scherer@bio.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-4564
Nicole BrennholtFederal Institute of Hydrology, Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, D-56002, Koblenz, Germany.
Georg ReifferscheidFederal Institute of Hydrology, Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, D-56002, Koblenz, Germany.
Martin WagnerGoethe University Frankfurt/Main, Department Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, D-60323, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4402-3234
Federal Institute of Hydrology · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic plastic items (microplastics) are ubiquitously present in aquatic ecosystems. With decreasing size their availability and potential to accumulate throughout food webs increase. However, little is known on the uptake of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates. To address this, we exposed species with different feeding strategies to 1, 10 and 90 µm fluorescent polystyrene spheres (3-3 000 particles mL

Indexed as

EatingFood ChainAmphipodaAnimalsChironomidaeDaphniaEcosystemFresh WaterInvertebratesPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalPlasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID29208925
PMCPMC5717137
OpenAlexW2770802549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.