Assembly of intermediates for rapid membrane fusion.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. HOPS-dependent vesicle tethering lock inhibits endolysosomal fusions and autophagosome secretion upon the loss of Syntaxin17.Science advances · 2025
   Article
2. Fusion with wild-type SNARE domains is controlled by juxtamembrane domains, transmembrane anchors, and Sec17.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022
   Article
3. Fusion of tethered membranes can be driven by Sec18/NSF and Sec17/αSNAP without HOPS.eLife · 2021
   Article
4. Sec17 (α-SNAP) and Sec18 (NSF) restrict membrane fusion to R-SNAREs, Q-SNAREs, and SM proteins from identical compartments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
   Article
5. Bacterial dynamin-like protein DynA mediates lipid and content mixing.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as