Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29208590›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study Cohort: Rationale, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.

Sengwee Toh, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Emily E Harmata, Roy Pardee, Rosalinde Saizan, Elisha Malanga, Jessica L Sturtevant, Casie E Horgan, Jane Anau, Cheri D Janning and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02741674 (National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02741674 completednot on this map

National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2016 to 2018Enrolled65,093ConditionsObesity, Bariatrics, Body Weight, Diabetes MellitusArmsRoux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) - historical, Adjustable gastric banding (AGB) - historical, Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) - historical
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The OneFlorida Data Trust: a centralized, translational research data infrastructure of statewide scope.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5160-0810
Laura J Rasmussen-TorvikNorthwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0820-7300
Emily E HarmataVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-634X
Roy PardeeKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-8159
Rosalinde SaizanOchsner Surgical Weight Loss Center, New Orleans, LA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-5660
Elisha MalangaCOPD Foundation, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-610X
Jessica L SturtevantDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-2357
Casie E HorganDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-7248
Jane AnauKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0527-4556
Cheri D JanningDuke Clinical & Translational Science Institute, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3412-6974
Robert D WellmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-6134
R Yates ColeyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1708-4880
Andrea J CookKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6848-5222
Anita P CourcoulasDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-7869
Karen J ColemanDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2052-0885
Neely A WilliamsCommunity Partners' Network, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-224X
Kathleen M McTigueDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-1576
David ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-8492
James McClayUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3404-0671
PCORnet Bariatric Surgery Collaborative

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
Stem Cell/Organoid and Genome Editing CoreP30DK078392 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Alexander Miethke · 2007 to 2026
$24.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK078392NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute OBS-1505-30683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough bariatric procedures are commonly performed in clinical practice, long-term data on the comparative effectiveness and safety of different procedures on sustained weight loss, comorbidities, and adverse effects are limited, especially in important patient subgroups (eg, individuals with diabetes, older patients, adolescents, and minority patients).

objectiveThe objective of this study was to create a population-based cohort of patients who underwent 3 commonly performed bariatric procedures-adjustable gastric band (AGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)-to examine the long-term comparative effectiveness and safety of these procedures in both adults and adolescents.

methodsWe identified adults (20 to 79 years old) and adolescents (12 to 19 years old) who underwent a primary (first observed) AGB, RYGB, or SG procedure between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2015 from 42 health systems participating in the Clinical Data Research Networks within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet). We extracted information on patient demographics, encounters with healthcare providers, diagnoses recorded and procedures performed during these encounters, vital signs, and laboratory test results from patients' electronic health records (EHRs). The outcomes of interest included weight change, incidence of major surgery-related adverse events, and diabetes remission and relapse, collected for up to 10 years after the initial bariatric procedure.

resultsA total of 65,093 adults and 777 adolescents met the eligibility criteria of the study. The adult subcohort had a mean age of 45 years and was predominantly female (79.30%, 51,619/65,093). Among adult patients with non-missing race or ethnicity information, 72.08% (41,248/57,227) were White, 21.13% (12,094/57,227) were Black, and 20.58% (13,094/63,637) were Hispanic. The average highest body mass index (BMI) recorded in the year prior to surgery was 49 kg/m

conclusionsOur study cohort is one of the largest cohorts of patients with bariatric procedures in the United States. Patients are geographically and demographically diverse, which improves the generalizability of the research findings and allows examination of treatment effect heterogeneity. Ongoing and planned investigations will provide real-world evidence on the long-term benefits and risks of these most commonly used bariatric procedures in current clinical practice.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerycomparative effectivenessobesityreal-world evidenceweight loss

Identifiers

PMID29208590
PMCPMC5736875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.