ArticleJMIR research protocols2017
The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study Cohort: Rationale, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02741674 (National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Bariatric Study
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Implementing a quality assurance and maintenance framework for standardized clinical terminology data in a multi-institutional setting.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Visualizing the Complexity of the PCORnet® Infrastructure and Implications for Designing PCORnet® Studies.Medical care · 2026Article
- CMEO: a metadata-centric ontology for clinical studies exploration and harmonization assessment.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A scoping review of OMOP CDM adoption for cancer research using real world data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A future of data-rich pharmacoepidemiology studies: transitioning to large-scale linked electronic health record + claims data.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Decades in the Making: The Evolution of Digital Health Research Infrastructure Through Synthetic Data, Common Data Models, and Federated Learning.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Exploring patient perspectives on shared decision making about bariatric surgery in two healthcare systems.Obesity science & practice · 2024Article
- Long term cost outcomes among commercially insured patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures.Obesity science & practice · 2024Article
- Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients Following Bariatric Surgery: A Scoping Review.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Representing and utilizing clinical textual data for real world studies: An OHDSI approach.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- The OneFlorida Data Trust: a centralized, translational research data infrastructure of statewide scope.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Which nutritional prognosis is better? comparison of the three most commonly performed bariatric surgeries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Data assimilation on mechanistic models of glucose metabolism predicts glycemic states in adolescents following bariatric surgery.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Building an OMOP common data model-compliant annotated corpus for COVID-19 clinical trials.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Temporal relationship of computed and structured diagnoses in electronic health record data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Characterization of bariatric surgery and outcomes using administrative claims data in the research network of a nationwide commercial health plan.BMC health services research · 2021Observational
- Comparing the 5-Year Diabetes Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORNet) Bariatric Study.JAMA surgery · 2020Article
- Privacy-protecting multivariable-adjusted distributed regression analysis for multi-center pediatric study.Pediatric research · 2020Article
- Interventions and Operations 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery in a Cohort From the US National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Bariatric Study.JAMA surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough bariatric procedures are commonly performed in clinical practice, long-term data on the comparative effectiveness and safety of different procedures on sustained weight loss, comorbidities, and adverse effects are limited, especially in important patient subgroups (eg, individuals with diabetes, older patients, adolescents, and minority patients).
objectiveThe objective of this study was to create a population-based cohort of patients who underwent 3 commonly performed bariatric procedures-adjustable gastric band (AGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)-to examine the long-term comparative effectiveness and safety of these procedures in both adults and adolescents.
methodsWe identified adults (20 to 79 years old) and adolescents (12 to 19 years old) who underwent a primary (first observed) AGB, RYGB, or SG procedure between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2015 from 42 health systems participating in the Clinical Data Research Networks within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet). We extracted information on patient demographics, encounters with healthcare providers, diagnoses recorded and procedures performed during these encounters, vital signs, and laboratory test results from patients' electronic health records (EHRs). The outcomes of interest included weight change, incidence of major surgery-related adverse events, and diabetes remission and relapse, collected for up to 10 years after the initial bariatric procedure.
resultsA total of 65,093 adults and 777 adolescents met the eligibility criteria of the study. The adult subcohort had a mean age of 45 years and was predominantly female (79.30%, 51,619/65,093). Among adult patients with non-missing race or ethnicity information, 72.08% (41,248/57,227) were White, 21.13% (12,094/57,227) were Black, and 20.58% (13,094/63,637) were Hispanic. The average highest body mass index (BMI) recorded in the year prior to surgery was 49 kg/m
conclusionsOur study cohort is one of the largest cohorts of patients with bariatric procedures in the United States. Patients are geographically and demographically diverse, which improves the generalizability of the research findings and allows examination of treatment effect heterogeneity. Ongoing and planned investigations will provide real-world evidence on the long-term benefits and risks of these most commonly used bariatric procedures in current clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.