Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29208014›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017

Plasma C4d as marker for lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Myriam Martin, Karolina I Smoląg, Albin Björk, Birgitta Gullstrand, Marcin Okrój, Jonatan Leffler, Andreas Jönsen, Anders A Bengtsson, Anna M Blom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: A scoping review.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lupus Nephritis Biomarkers: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Editorial: Complement and COVID-19 Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Myriam MartinDepartment of Translational Medicine, Section of Medical Protein Chemistry, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Karolina I SmolągDepartment of Translational Medicine, Section of Medical Protein Chemistry, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Albin BjörkDepartment of Translational Medicine, Section of Medical Protein Chemistry, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Birgitta GullstrandRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Marcin OkrójDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jonatan LefflerTelethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Andreas JönsenRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anders A BengtssonRheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna M BlomDepartment of Translational Medicine, Section of Medical Protein Chemistry, Lund University, Inga Marie Nilsson's Street 53, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden. anna.blom@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SEGdańsk Medical University · PLUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2016-01142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the present study, we sought to evaluate the complement activation product C4d as a marker for lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

methodsC4d levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in plasma samples of patients with established SLE using a novel approach based on detection of a short linear cleavage neoepitope. Cross-sectional associations were studied in 98 patients with SLE with samples taken at lower or higher respective disease activity. Temporal associations were investigated in 69 patients with SLE who were followed longitudinally for up to 5 years. Plasma samples from 77 healthy donors were included as controls.

resultsC4d levels were negligible in healthy control subjects and significantly increased in patients with SLE in the cross-sectional study (p < 0.0001). C4d levels discriminated between higher and lower disease activity according to ROC curve analysis (p < 0.001), exhibiting a positive predictive value of 68%. At higher disease activity, C4d levels correlated with the modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (p = 0.011) and predominantly with lupus nephritis (p = 0.003), exhibiting a sensitivity of 79% to identify patients with nephritis. High C4d levels together with the presence of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies preceded and thus predicted future lupus nephritis in the longitudinal study (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4-21.3). When we considered only patients with renal involvement (19 of 69) during the longitudinal study, we found that high C4d levels alone could forecast recurrence of future lupus nephritis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-9.6).

conclusionsC4d appears to be a valuable marker for use in monitoring of patients with SLE, particularly for lupus nephritis. Importantly, C4d levels can predict impending flares of lupus nephritis and may thus be useful for informing treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersComplement C4bCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLupus NephritisMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsYoung AdultBiomarkersComplement C4bcomplement C4dPeptide FragmentsC4dComplementFlareLupus nephritisSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID29208014
PMCPMC5717799
OpenAlexW2753510678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.