Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207995›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Physicians using spinal manipulative treatment in The Netherlands: a description of their characteristics and their patients.

Wouter Schuller, Raymond W J G Ostelo, Daphne C Rohrich, Adri T Apeldoorn, Henrica C W de Vet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wouter SchullerVU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. w.schuller@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-7321
Raymond W J G OsteloVU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daphne C RohrichVU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adri T ApeldoornRehabilitation department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Henrica C W de VetVU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Association for Musculoskeletal Medicine n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious health care professionals apply Spinal Manipulative Treatment (SMT) in daily practice. While the characteristics of chiropractors and manual therapists and the characteristics of their patient populations are well described, there is little research about physicians who use SMT techniques. A distinct group of physicians in The Netherlands has been trained in musculoskeletal (MSK) medicine, which includes the use of SMT. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of these physicians and their patient population.

methodsAll registered MSK physicians were approached with questionnaires and telephone interviews to collect data about their characteristics. Data about patient characteristics were extracted from a web-based register. In this register physicians recorded basic patient data (age, gender, the type and duration of the main complaint, concomitant complaints and the type of referral) at the first consultation. Patients were invited to fill in web-based questionnaires to provide baseline data about previous treatments and the severity of their main complaint. Functional impairment was measured with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

resultsQuestionnaires were sent to 138 physicians of whom 90 responded (65%). Most physicians were trained in MSK medicine after a career in other medical specialities. They reported to combine their SMT treatment with a variety of diagnostic and treatment options part of which were only permissible for physicians, such as prescription medication and injections. The majority of patients presented with complaints of long duration (62.1% > 1 year), most frequently low back pain (48.1%) or neck pain (16.9%), with mean scores of 6.0 and 6.2, respectively, on a 0 to10 numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity. Mean scores on all PROMs showed moderate impairment. Patients most frequently reported previous treatment by physical therapists (68.1%), manual therapists (37.7%) or chiropractors (17.0%).

conclusionOur study showed that MSK physicians in The Netherlands used an array of SMT techniques. They embedded their SMT techniques in a broad array of other diagnostic and treatment options, part of which were limited to medical doctors. Most patients consulted MSK physicians with spinal pain of long duration with moderate functional impairment.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesNetherlandsPhysiciansRegistriesTreatment OutcomeChiropractic treatmentManual therapyMSK medicineMusculoskeletal medicinePatient characteristicsSpinal manipulative treatment

Identifiers

PMID29207995
PMCPMC5718083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.