Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207961›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.

Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jørn Wetterslev, Per Winkel

10 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,322 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,322citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04666831 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Adapted Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Food Addiction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Metropolitan UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsFood Addiction, Binge EatingArmsAdapted Motivational Interviewing (AMI) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
NCT04886791 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy (VANH): a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZuyderland Medisch CentrumRan2021 to 2025Enrolled124ConditionsHysterectomy, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery, Vaginal HysterectomyArmsVaginal NOTES hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy
NCT04982978 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of the Protection Motivation Theory in Reducing Vaping Behaviour in a Student Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled77ConditionsVaping Related DisorderArmsPMT Threat Appraisal, General Nutrition and Lifestyle
NCT05189470 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Inforatio Technique to Promote Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: a Parallel-group, Evaluator-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsDiabetic Foot Ulcer, Diabetes, Foot Ulcer, Diabetic FootArmsInforatio technique, Usual care of the respective outpatient clinics
NCT05418140 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Adenomyosis and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment: a Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study (AdAPT-ART)

TypeobservationalSponsorCARE Fertility UKRan2022 to 2025Enrolled828ConditionsAdenomyosis, Infertility, ART, Pregnancy LossArmsUltrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis
NCT05932823 completednot on this map

Airflow and Hip Prosthesis Infections: A Registry Study Comparing Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergRan2010 to 2021Enrolled110,000ConditionsHip Prosthesis InfectionArmsLaminary airflow
NCT05988489 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Deconstructive Psychotherapy Versus Brief Intervention and Contact for Suicidal Adolescents and Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorState University of New York - Upstate Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled106ConditionsSuicidal IdeationArmsDynamic Deconstructive Psychotherapy (DDP), Brief Intervention and Contact (BIC)
NCT06018285 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Stepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorCynthia FontanellaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled2,572ConditionsSuicidal Ideation, Suicide, Attempted, Suicide PreventionArmsStepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care
NCT06695832 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Adjunctive Fosfomycin for Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia: Protocol for a Pooled Post-hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Clinical Trials

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled369ConditionsStaphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
NCT07309302 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Psychosocial Determinants and Impact of a Synchronous Remote Cognitive Remediation Program on Individuals With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité du Québec a MontréalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSDArmsCognitive Remediation Training, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,322 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Nasal sprays and a behavioural intervention for respiratory tract infections in primary care: 12-month follow-up of a randomised open-label trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

1,262 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janus Christian JakobsenThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. jcj@ctu.dk.
Christian GluudThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørn WetterslevThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per WinkelThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissing data may seriously compromise inferences from randomised clinical trials, especially if missing data are not handled appropriately. The potential bias due to missing data depends on the mechanism causing the data to be missing, and the analytical methods applied to amend the missingness. Therefore, the analysis of trial data with missing values requires careful planning and attention.

methodsThe authors had several meetings and discussions considering optimal ways of handling missing data to minimise the bias potential. We also searched PubMed (key words: missing data; randomi*; statistical analysis) and reference lists of known studies for papers (theoretical papers; empirical studies; simulation studies; etc.) on how to deal with missing data when analysing randomised clinical trials.

resultsHandling missing data is an important, yet difficult and complex task when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We consider how to optimise the handling of missing data during the planning stage of a randomised clinical trial and recommend analytical approaches which may prevent bias caused by unavoidable missing data. We consider the strengths and limitations of using of best-worst and worst-best sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation, and full information maximum likelihood. We also present practical flowcharts on how to deal with missing data and an overview of the steps that always need to be considered during the analysis stage of a trial.

conclusionsWe present a practical guide and flowcharts describing when and how multiple imputation should be used to handle missing data in randomised clinical.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalData AccuracyHumansModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMissing dataMultiple imputationRandomised clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID29207961
PMCPMC5717805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 4 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.