Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207902›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2018

Analgesics promote welfare and sustain tumour growth in orthotopic 4T1 and B16 mouse cancer models.

Jennifer Lofgren, Amy L Miller, Claudia Chui Shan Lee, Carla Bradshaw, Paul Flecknell, Johnny Roughan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic Ability of Methods Depicting Distress of Tumor-Bearing Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Analgesics on Tumor Growth in Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer Lofgren1 Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Amy L Miller2 School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Claudia Chui Shan Lee3 Pain and Animal Welfare Science Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Carla Bradshaw3 Pain and Animal Welfare Science Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Paul Flecknell3 Pain and Animal Welfare Science Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Johnny Roughan3 Pain and Animal Welfare Science Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Comparative Biology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G0900763/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Murine orthotopic cancer models often require surgery, potentially causing pain or distress. However, analgesics are often withheld because they may alter tumour development. Two orthotopically implanted cancers were investigated in mice pre-treated with meloxicam (10 mg/kg), buprenorphine (0.2 mg/kg) or saline (1 ml/kg). Tumours were imaged and welfare was assessed using body weight, behaviour and nociceptive responses. In study 1, BALB/c mice were inoculated with 4T1 mammary carcinoma or saline during surgery or anaesthesia. As pre-treatment with a single buprenorphine dose appeared beneficial to cancer growth consistency, a second cohort of mice additionally received saline or buprenorphine at 12 and 24 h. Surgery resulted in increased mammary tumour growth and lung metastases. These unwanted effects were lessened by buprenorphine pre-treatment, especially when given repeatedly. Mammary tumour-bearing mice became less active and nociceptive thresholds declined over time, indicating some discomfort as tumours grew. In study 2, C57BL/6 mice received B16 melanoma. This non-surgical model was used to determine whether meloxicam or buprenorphine affected cancer seeding of the lungs. While meloxicam reduced B16 lung seeding, buprenorphine did not. Mechanical thresholds decreased as cancer developed in mice bearing melanoma, but the magnitude of this was insufficient to conclude that there were any significant welfare concerns. This study highlights the scientific value in utilising non-surgical models, where possible. When surgery must be performed at the time of tumour inoculation, the effects of this should be controlled with appropriate analgesics to enhance the value and possibly translation of the research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnalgesicsAnimalsAnimal WelfareBreast NeoplasmsBuprenorphineCell Line, TumorFemaleLung NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMelanoma, ExperimentalMeloxicamMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasm MetastasisAnalgesicsBuprenorphineMeloxicamThiazinesThiazolesanalgesiabuprenorphinecancermeloxicammouseNSAIDrefinement

Identifiers

PMID29207902
PMCPMC6068963
OpenAlexW2775275687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.