ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017
Comparison of Gingival Biotype between different Genders based on Measurement of Dentopapillary Complex.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06369493 (The Interaction of The Gingival And Tooth Morphometric Parameters On The Gingival Phenotype), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Interaction of The Gingival And Tooth Morphometric Parameters On The Gingival Phenotype
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interdental Papilla Morphology in Relation to Periodontal Soft- and Hard-Tissue Dimensions in Young Adults: A Clinical and CBCT-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of transmucosal probe visualization for peri-implant mucosal phenotype assessment: A cross-sectional study.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Gingival Phenotype and Associated Factors in Orthodontically Treated Individuals and Untreated Controls: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The influence of implant platform apico-coronal position on the bone level of adjacent teeth.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Linking facial typology to dental morphology and gingival characteristics: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A comprehensive analysis of gingival phenotype: interaction and relationship between gingival and tooth morphometric parameters.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of the effect of periodontal health and orthodontic treatment on gingival recession: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Prevalence, etiology and clinical characteristics of gingival recession in a sample of adult Egyptian dental patients: a cross sectional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Prevalence of Gingival Recession According to the Cairo Classification in a Population from the North of Portugal.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals the underlying regulatory mechanisms of red blood traits in Anadara granosa.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Prevalence of the Gingival Phenotype in Adults and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- Article
- The gingival phenotypes and related clinical periodontal parameters in a cohort of Pakistani young adults.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Revisiting the measurement of keratinized gingiva: a cross-sectional study comparing an intraoral scanner with clinical parameters.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2023Article
- Gingival phenotype determination: Cutoff values, relationship between gingival and alveolar crest bone thickness at different landmarks.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- The incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures in adults treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a retrospective cohort study.Head & face medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of Age and Gender-Related Changes in Gingival Width in Patients of Known Population: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021Article
- Is There an Association between the Gingival Phenotype and the Width of Keratinized Gingiva? A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2021Review
- The influence of gingival phenotype on the morphology of the maxillary central papilla.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Prevalence of gingival recession and its correlation with gingival phenotype in mandibular incisors region of orthodontically treated female patients: A cross-sectional study.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical and aesthetic outcomes after periodontal or implant surgical procedures are determined by anatomical and morphological characteristics of the gingiva like width of keratinized gingiva, thickness of gingiva and alveolar bone. Therefore, the knowledge of gingival biotype plays an important role in modifying the dental therapeutic procedures for the desired outcome and predictability.
aimThe aim of the present study was to assess and compare the gingival biotype among genders by clinical, photographic and radiographic parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 800 subjects (400 males and 400 females) were considered for the study. Width of keratinized gingiva (GW), transparency of the periodontal probe through the sulcus (TRAN) were assessed clinically; Crown Width/Crown Length ratio (CW/CL) and Papillary Height (PH) were assessed photographically; Gingival Thickness (GT1, GT2, GT3) and Alveolar bone Thickness (AT1, AT2, AT3) were assessed radiographically. The obtained data was correlated to compare the gingival biotype between males and females. The collected data was statistically analysed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.
resultsThe TRAN at GT1, GT2 and GT3 as well as at AT1, AT2 and AT3 showed a very strong positive correlation in males (r>0.8) as compared to females (r<0.8). A very strong positive correlation was observed between GT1, GT2, GT3 and AT1, AT2, AT3 in males (r>0.9) as compared to females (r<0.7).
conclusionThere are definite differences in the gingival biotype among different genders with predominance of a thin gingival biotype with reduced alveolar bone thickness in females as compared to males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.