Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207438›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2018

Caterpillars induce jasmonates in flowers and alter plant responses to a second attacker.

Lucille T S Chrétien, Anja David, Eirini Daikou, Wilhelm Boland, Jonathan Gershenzon, David Giron, Marcel Dicke, Dani Lucas-Barbosa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improvement ofBiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quint Rusman.The New phytologist · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucille T S ChrétienLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Radix building, 6708PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Anja DavidDepartment of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPI CE), Beutenberg Campus, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 8, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
Eirini DaikouLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Radix building, 6708PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wilhelm BolandDepartment of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPI CE), Beutenberg Campus, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 8, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
Jonathan GershenzonDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPI CE), Beutenberg Campus, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 8, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
David GironInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte (IRBI), UMR 7261, CNRS/Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Avenue Monge, Parc Grandmont, 37200, Tours, France.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Radix building, 6708PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8565-8896
Dani Lucas-BarbosaLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Radix building, 6708PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3440-1040
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEWageningen University & Research · NLUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, herbivorous insects and plant pathogens are generally abundant when plants are flowering. Thus, plants face a diversity of attackers during their reproductive phase. Plant responses to one attacker can interfere with responses to a second attacker, and phytohormones that orchestrate plant reproduction are also involved in resistance to insect and pathogen attack. We quantified phytohormonal responses of flowering plants exposed to single or dual attack and studied resistance mechanisms of plants in the flowering stage. Flowering Brassica nigra were exposed to either a chewing caterpillar, a phloem-feeding aphid or a bacterial pathogen, and plant hormonal responses were compared with dual attack situations. We quantified phytohormones in inflorescences and leaves, and determined the consequences of hormonal changes for components of direct and indirect plant resistance. Caterpillars were the main inducers of jasmonates in inflorescences, and the phytohormonal profile of leaves was not affected by either insect or pathogen attack. Dual attack increased plant resistance to caterpillars, but compromised resistance to aphids. Parasitoid performance was negatively correlated with the performance of their hosts. We conclude that plants prioritize resistance of reproductive tissues over vegetative tissues, and that a chewing herbivore species is the main driver of responses in flowering B. nigra.

Indexed as

AnimalsAphidsBiomassCyclopentanesFemaleFlowersInflorescenceLarvaMustard PlantOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesCyclopentanesjasmonic acidOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsBrassica nigra (Brassicaceae)florivorous insectsflowersmultiple attackparasitoidsphytohormonesphytopathogensplant resistance

Identifiers

PMID29207438
PMCPMC5814890
OpenAlexW2772735906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.