Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207280›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Hybrid capture as a tool for cervical lesions screening in HIV-infected women: insights from a Brazilian cohort.

Emilia Moreira Jalil, Paula M Luz, Marcel Quintana, Ruth Khalili Friedman, Rosa M Domingues S Madeira, Angela Cristina Andrade, Janice Chicarino, Ronaldo Ismerio Moreira, Monica Derrico, José Eduardo Levi and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Emilia Moreira JalilFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: emjalil@hotmail.com.
Paula M LuzFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marcel QuintanaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ruth Khalili FriedmanFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rosa M Domingues S MadeiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Angela Cristina AndradeFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Janice ChicarinoFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ronaldo Ismerio MoreiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Monica DerricoFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
José Eduardo LeviUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabio RussomanoFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Valdilea Gonçalves VelosoFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Beatriz GrinsztejnFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI) Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer remains an important burden for HIV-infected women in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. Recommendations for cervical screening in these women diverge and may include high-risk HPV (HRHPV) testing. We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a single HRHPV testing for cervical screening of HIV-infected women.

methods723 HIV-infected women from a Brazilian prospective cohort were included between 1996 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were: normal cervical cytology at baseline and having a HRHPV-test at baseline. We calculated incidence rates of any squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and high grade SIL+ (HSIL+) and negative predictive values (NPV) within 12 and 36 months. Hazard Ratios were obtained using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

resultsIncidence rate for both outcomes was low (9.9 cases per 100 PY [95% CI 8.8-11.0] for any SIL and 1.3 cases per 100 PY [95% IC 0.9-1.8] for HSIL+). Women with a HRHPV positive status at baseline had 1.7-fold (95% CI 1.3-2.2) and 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.5-7.1) increased risk of presenting any SIL and HSIL+, respectively, during follow-up. Negative-HRHPV test presented high NPV for both periods and outcomes (any SIL: 92.4% [95% CI 89.7-94.6] for 12 months and 80.9% [95% CI 77.2-84.3] for 36 months; and HSIL+: 99.8% [95% CI 98.9-100.0] for 12 months and 99.0 [95% CI 97.6-99.7] for 36 months).

conclusionsIncidence of any and high grade cytological abnormality was significantly higher among HIV-infected women with positive-HRHPV test. A single negative-HRHPV test helped reassure follow-up free of cytological abnormalities through three years of follow-up in HIV-infected women with negative cytology.

Indexed as

AdultBrazilCD4 Lymphocyte CountEarly DiagnosisFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningMultivariate AnalysisPapillomavirus InfectionsPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentCohortHIVHPVIncidenceWomen

Identifiers

PMID29207280
PMCPMC9425652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.